Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-23-2010, 09:49 PM   #41 (permalink)
My home? Discabled,
 
Barnard17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 203
Default

PRC and Russia do it in the open because the press won't report on them. It doesn't not-happen in more democratic countries, there's just greater jeopardy that people will find out about it. Why did Governments not curtail banks giving out dodgy loans, why has America's rebuilding of Iraq fallen to American businesses rather than the funds at least propping up the demolished Iraqi economy. Why does no democracy deal with an issue until it's clear that they'll lose an election if they don't? Because to the individual of power it's far more economically beneficial to pocket money off big business and maintain a broken status quo than it is to fight to fix the country.

There are three types of politician. Popular idiots who look pretty but can't find their arse with their hands tied behind their backs. Clever men with an eye to making themselves money. Clever men with convictions to sort stuff out. Most safe seats are the second type, swing seats tend between the first and second. There's precious few of the third and they get in by fluke.

Sorry if I sound like a pessimist, but most states politicians are too disorganised to quell the press and have to keep back-room lobbying under the table. In states such as China and Russia (Gazprom ahoy!) the press is so abysmally downtrodden they can do what they want without fear of public repercussion so on an international scale it's obvious what's going on. The only difference. Politics is and always has been about people in power keeping citizens happy and making as much money on the side as they can (just look at the expenses scandal in the UK). The only time this is different is when the state is in a great governmental revolution, and then the ticking clock begins before the money starts flowing again.
__________________


Vita brevis,
Occasio praeceps
Barnard17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 10:52 PM   #42 (permalink)
ComputerHabenHerzschmerz
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 6,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnard17 View Post
PRC and Russia do it in the open because the press won't report on them.
sounds kinky
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zhanteimi View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" - ʕººʔ
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” ― Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” – Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." - John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." — Keith Richards ☮ 💖 ♫ ∞ ἰχθύς
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 05:59 PM   #43 (permalink)
moon shoes
 
Ronnie Jane Devo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 57
Default

Fantastic post Barnard, you sum things up better than I could have hoped to.

As to the globalization issue, I believe it is dangerous by way of creating a monopoly situation. When countries maintain their sovereignty they are kept in a sort of competition with each other whereby one country that maintains a better standard of living can produce or attract citizens who are more talented or productive, leading to greater prosperity for that country, and thus forcing more repressive countries to re-evaluate their political structure lest their international influence dwindle to obscurity.

If all that power is concentrated into a world government, there is relatively little keeping the ruling party/cabal in check, so they have a similar leeway to exploit their constituents that a corporate monopoly has to exploit its consumers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog View Post
Wendy?
Who?
__________________
Last.fm
Ronnie Jane Devo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2010, 04:40 AM   #44 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 3
Default

As an Aussie I think we should. But I also think it's not going to make much difference in our everyday lives whether we are or we aren't. More important things going on.
shred is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2019 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.