|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Should abstinence be taught in schools? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 17.86% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
23 | 82.14% |
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 (permalink) |
Man vs. Wild Turkey
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 948
|
![]()
"Should abstinence be taught in school?" I'm not quite sure how to answer that.
Yes, during sexual education, abstinence should be discussed as an option. But without any religious or moral connotation. It's not right to make a young person feel shame and guilt for wanting to act on natural impulses. Sure, the church will tell you that you shouldn't have sex before you get married, but some priests will also tell you that it's okay for you to suck their cock when you're only 12. Let's keep that out of schools, shall we? But if you're asking if sexual education should be "abstinence only", then fuck no. People like George Bush and Sarah Palin will tout the virtues of abstinence-only sex education. Probably because their children are such fucking mutants. I remember shortly after Palin's retarded-ass daughter dumped her baby out, they were parading her on magazines and talk shows like she was anything more than a reformed slam-pig. One quote in particular stuck with me: "If people realized the consequences of having sex, then nobody would be doing it... Trust me." Now isn't that one of the most retarded fucking things you've ever heard in your life? Abstinence-only sex education is an oxymoron. EDIT: I didn't see the "(At all)" at the end of the title. My answer is yes, so long as it's objective.
__________________
OF THE SUN Last edited by ElephantSack; 02-09-2010 at 05:12 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
|