When it comes to animal cruelty I don't ever calm down.
I'm an animal myself, as you can see :)

Dont smiley face thingy me S k. I dont want to be on your secret hit list..lol.

*must... not... smile....*
No man, you're safe :D <-- Dammit!

Oh, you're one of those "people".

Oh my god, that is just disgusting. Some people just make me sick.

Didn't you just do the exact same? :)



I could... but.. you know. That's less fun.

'Just' make you sick? Are you implying they could do more?

You really need to work on your sarcasm detector.

I'm missing a flux capacitor. As soon as I have that it'll be fixed.

Is English not your first language or something? I don't think that my statement was in anyway hard to understand.

:rofl:

que?

I was being serious. I wasn't sure what exactly you didn't understand about my statement.

Problem is, I wasn't.

Oh. I guess I was the one who didn't understand. Well then here's a puppy:

http://ihasahotdog.files.wordpress.c...-with-bone.jpg

Naaah don't think so. Take it easy from now on, will ya?

awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

Sooooo....... animal cruelty.........

yes back on topic people

There was a recent news story where a house that kept cats was burned down during the night. They lost about 30 cats. The firefighters tried to get in to save the cats but they couldn't and all they could hear was the cats meowing super loud because they were trapped in cages. I think it was an animal shelter I wish I could find the article but my google skills are failing me at the moment plus i'm not sure where in NY that it happened.

I feel like there HAD to have been more to that story and someone should be held accountable. I don't believe for one second that the fire was accidental it was most likely set on purpose but someone in the neighborhood that was tired of those cats and/or tired of the people that ran the shelter. It could have also been some deranged person that was denied being able to adopt a cat so they decided to come back later and burn down the whole joint.

Most likely it was just some bored ****wad teenager with lazy, ****ty parents. That's ****ing horrible. Man, this thread is starting to remind me of my mother when she used to work at an emeergency veterinarian hospital. She would always come home with some story of a puppy that got hit by a car and had to be put asleep or a litter of kittens that got run over with a lawn mower. The lawn mower thing actually happened. My mother took home one of the kittens and we took care of it for a few weeks till it died. Eventually I just had to tell her to not tell me about her work days cause they were just so depressing.

How did you reach that conclusion? Seems incredibly narrow minded to me.

Also you guys sound crazy "some deranged guy who couldn't adopt a cat might have burned it down", next you'll be blaming the bush administration or the illuminati. There is a HUGE chance that this was an accident.

Humans aren't going around looking for animals to kill, there's not any conspiracy theory here people. Some cats died in an accidental fire, hardly animal cruelty.

I was just stating that as a random possibility since we don't have the full facts of the story. I wasn't claiming any of that to be a FACT.

Yeah I know but it seemed like a massive stretch of the imagination, out of all the scenarios you could have concocted that was by far the most random. Perhaps it's a cultural thing but I find it more likely someone left something alight that they shouldn't have (cigarette or some sort of appliance like hair straightners). And if it was deliberate it was probably the fire that was deliberate rather than the intent to wipe out a small clan of kittens, for example kids setting fire to a trash can or something. It's rare for someone to set fire to an entire building because of some grudge they have against cats... I mean come on.

lol I have a good imagination at times.

there just seems to be something fishy about this story and I don't like it so that's why I came up with the scenarios. I would agree that it could've been an accident but they usually find out that information pretty quickly and say that the source of the fire was an accident. They happened to omit how the fire originated so my mind ran away with different scenarios.

Perhaps it was just crap journalism? lol They usually release information commenting on whether or not the fire is being treated as "suspicious".

All we can do until they release more information is speculate I suppose.


I have a quick question for the animal lovers in this thread, how do you feel about keeping pets? (I'm trying to get an idea on how 'extreme' your values are as I know some people believe all animals should be 'free')

Assuming it was arson, it was probably kids, I guess is what I'm saying.

I thought you animal lovers might get a kick out of this;

"The black and white cat was put inside a microwave oven by Sherlock and the microwave was switched on.

Roxy was then pushed into a tumble drier and spun before being put in a freezer and finally "dunked" in a bowl of washing up water."


BBC News - Teignmouth youths sentenced for microwave cat cruelty

"might get a kick out of this".
Dude, what the **** are you doing?

RandyMarsh, you're a douche

I would refrain from supporting animal cruelty or hinting that its amusing in any way. Animal lovers are more passionate than alcoholic southern baptists. Just ask this guy

http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i4...ichaelvick.jpg

I wasn't supporting animal cruelty you idiots. Just last week someone posted an article about animal cruelty and was asking why it doesn't get more attention in the news, All I did was the exact same thing, I thought you people might want to hear about his article I read today, I thought it would start a discussion, keep the thread alive.

Get a grip you ****ing ****s.

^^^:rofl::rofl:

Dude, you said we may get a kick out of animal cruelty.
How the **** do you think we would react to that in a positive way?
Glad you don't support animal cruelty though.

I said "get a kick out of this" Implying you would get a kick out of the article (the idiots who tortured the animal were caught weren't they?) not a kick out of the cruelty.


Christ I didn't think I'd need to explain every sentence I post.

Randy Marsh you are a bad person and think animal cruelty is funny!!!

Well technically maybe I'm not totally against animal cruelty if you consider killing animals for food to be animal cruelty. When i think of the term though I mainly think of people harming pet animals and like beating dogs or setting cats on fire which I don't support.

Allright. Figures. I didn't click the link (I just don't want to know).
But I still don't get a kick out of it.
But allright, I did interpret that wrong. Not just me, so I guess it was a bit of an odd way of putting things.

That's my definition of it.

when you bring up something that can be a bit touchy for people you DO have to make sure to explain yourself properly so they understand where you are coming from.

Might be a good idea next time.
But allright, he didn't mean what we thought he meant, so it's allright now :).

If killing animals for survival is animal cruelty then im guilty of it to in a sense. I dont hunt animals but im definatley a meat and potato's man. Well I do fish so I guess thats contributing for all the specific detail nazi's out there.

Well, since you could just eat a salad, it's not really survival is it? I eat meat too, so I'm not attacking, but we don't actually have to eat meat.