|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
| View Poll Results: Your level of observance? | |||
| Non-practicing/secular form of religion |
|
20 | 43.48% |
| A little observant |
|
3 | 6.52% |
| Middle-of-the-road observance |
|
11 | 23.91% |
| Strict adherence to religious rules |
|
4 | 8.70% |
| Don't know |
|
8 | 17.39% |
| Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
I don't think all atheists are scumbags, no. I just can't respect the idea, it seems infantile to me. "The grouped of non-group-eds" For example - the bus ads in the UK. Some Christian group put out an ad saying smething like "Have faith in God live a good life" etc. your general "We love Jesus" sort of thing So what do the local "atheist non-theocratic committee of non-commited non-group" group do? Put out an ad saying "There is no God. Live your life" If atheism is not a group, if atheism is not a religion, why would they feel they need to counter a message like that? The goal of atheism ultimatly as a group, which is what it is, is to eradicate all religion. Maybe individual atheists have no problem with religion, but as a group, that is the main agenda. If they're trying to spread atheism with ads like that, that means they want as many atheists as possible - they want to expand and spread their message. Therefore, they want to eradicate religion, pretty simple man. If you are how you say, then People like yourself aren't the ones I have a problem with, and I think by calling yourself atheist you're actually allying yourself with something more than just non-believing. So long as people are half-decent, I can respect it if they say "piss off I'm not joining your group I dont believe" - their choice. I can't respect it if they say, "piss off I'm not joining your group, I'm gonna go join this other group for people who don't wanna be in your group " because they've made it competitive. It's like making it the "cliques" of the world, thats stupid. If you don't believe, fine. If you believe different to me, fine. If you begrude me my belief, thats not fine. Just as though, I said - don't have a problem with religion, have a problem with the people who corrupt it. Well same principle; I have no problem with a lack of religion. I have a problem with people who corrupt the non-religious. atheism is a cult imo. Quote:
That would explain why they didnt like you helping, but tbh, you gotta look at the bigger picture here man. If you didnt help them exchange needles, they would get ill, they would spread disease. So they've fallen in a bad way, they're doing drugs and bad ****. But it's up to them to pull themselves out of it, all you can do is guide the lost sheep through the canyon. What you did was a service to God and Humanity, man. Herding the lost flock. One day, one of those people will get clean maybe, they'll live a decent life, have a family. That's thanks to you sir. If no-one exchanged the needles, they'd get aids or some **** and be dead in a ditch. As long as you're not the one actually giving them the drugs, then screw what your Church said, be proud of what you did dude I respect that. (if on the other hand it wasnt drugs related and it was purely medical needles, then they're a bunch of crazy ****ing ****s what sort of Christians are they) Last edited by crukster; 03-27-2011 at 03:26 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 942
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: GuangZhou, China
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
As usual, wrong again. When viewing the concept of 'atheism' (what a vapid word. It is a cliche) as trying to eradicate religion, it seems deplorable. The goal of secular humanists is not to eradicate religion directly, but to encourage humanism and reason. If the world can all work toward a common goal to make humanity better, to make better people, with as few restrictions as possible, there will be no need for religion because people will learn that beneficence and altruism is innate in us. Last edited by Schranz bass; 03-27-2011 at 09:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Groups OF atheists exist. If a religious group wants to put out their message, why don't you think its okay for an atheist group to do the same? I think it's stupid for either group to advertise like the example you talked about, since all it does is turn the non-believers off even more, but why can one group promote their "message" and the other group can't? I feel like atheists like that are more concerned with showing people that they can be good people and live great lives without a religion. Which is entirely true and I don't really see a problem with it other than thinking religious advertising of any kind is stupid. Your comment on competition is just stupid, what are they competing for? Competing to gain what? More members? There's no prize here. I'm not allying myself with anyone. I don't believe in God, that's all there is to say about it. I used to be more anti-religion, and now I'm more uncaring. Some people are helped by their beliefs and are raised a certain way. So although I think their beliefs might be stupid, I don't care enough to bash them or try to change their views. You just have this strange view of atheism and I don't get it. |
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: GuangZhou, China
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
WHat is this? The 13th century? Forget atheism. It is false reasoning. Secular humanism is more appropriate. Try it out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Replace one label with another one. Man, you're so edgy. What exactly makes atheism false reasoning? An atheist is someone who does not believe in a God. How many times am I gonna have to say that for you and crukster to understand? You can apply whatever label you want to people who don't believe in God, but there's already a perfectly suitable word for it and that word is "atheist."
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: GuangZhou, China
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
Because the belief in God is irrelevant. Society has to move out of the paradigm of supernatural belief; ergo: atheism is an erroneous concept. I hope that wasn't too edgy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What it lacked in edginess it made up for in stupidity. Belief in God is irrelevant? Religion is a gigantic part of pretty much every major culture on this planet so I fail to see how that is not somewhat relevant. "Forget atheism." What exactly is that supposed to mean? Forget the term used for people like myself who don't believe in God? You seem to be one of those people like crukster who thinks atheism is some crazy ideology or big club or something.
|
|
![]() |
|
|