Circumcision - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: How do you feel about circumcision?
For 11 26.19%
Against 31 73.81%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-30-2011, 11:38 PM   #31 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Thom Yorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra View Post
I'm curious why people are discussing this as a health risk, or not. The reason why children are circumcised has nothing to do with medical science. It's in the Bible, and the vast majority is carried on due to tradition.

Now, find me an analysis on cutting off toes, or nipples, or the health effects of anything else. There are none. The only reason that it's being analyzed on that level is to distract the fact that the tradition has been carried over so many years obviously due to religious tradition, any other 'health fact' involving is just a distraction of that.
The only reason I personally haven't mentioned religion or culture is because I put no weight behind it. Sure, that's a main reason why people have their children circumcised but it's definitely not the only one. The only factor that will come into play when I make the decision to circumcise my kid will be for medical purposes.

Just because some religious zealots may try to overstate health complications for the uncircumcised and use it as a distraction doesn't mean you should throw out the idea completely. There are increased health risks if you don't perform the procedure.
Thom Yorke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 12:06 AM   #32 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Paedantic Basterd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thom Yorke View Post
Just because some religious zealots may try to overstate health complications for the uncircumcised and use it as a distraction doesn't mean you should throw out the idea completely. There are increased health risks if you don't perform the procedure.
I'm guessing that the risks associated with not lopping off your foreskin are so minor as to be totally arguable, as the risks with using mouthwash or drinking apple juice or being left-handed are. If they were notable risks, then by now I think we'd have naturally selected the foreskin out of our genepool.
Paedantic Basterd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 02:40 AM   #33 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
I'm guessing that the risks associated with not lopping off your foreskin are so minor as to be totally arguable, as the risks with using mouthwash or drinking apple juice or being left-handed are. If they were notable risks, then by now I think we'd have naturally selected the foreskin out of our genepool.
Yes, the foreskin has important biological functions as Erica pointed out, for example being highly sensitive and allowing for non-abrasive sex. What the last part means is that the extra skin on the penis acts as a sort of buffer rolling over the shaft which for example allows for non-abrasive masturbation without lubricants. Basically, cutting the penis would impair sexual function for example when masturbating which I'm sure is deeply rooted in why the culture developed in the first place. Religions typically have problems with sexual drive.

As an intact male, I feel I should point out that I don't have any problems cleaning myself. My foreskin retracts just fine and if for some reason it doesn't for some, that's a medical problem that can and is taken care of without circumcision.
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 03:07 AM   #34 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

it's there no option for "indifferent"?

my dad is circumcised, i'm not

he certainly had no problems conceiving me
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 02:00 PM   #35 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Il Duce View Post
it's there no option for "indifferent"?
I'm not really that interested in indifferent opinions. I think people who are indifferent about it should read a bit - for example the stuff Erica mentions - and then form an opinion against circumcision.
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 03:44 PM   #36 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
The Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 803
Default

It's no better than cutting out the tongue on a newborn infant. It's a barbaric practice that ought to be criminalized. If it wasn't for the religious context, everyone would be revolted by it. Just another proof of the undeserved respect that religion receives in modern society.
__________________
Now another stranger seems to want you to ignore his dreams as though they were the burden of some other


Last edited by The Monkey; 10-02-2011 at 10:01 AM.
The Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 03:53 PM   #37 (permalink)
AWhatup Ganache?
 
Mykonos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 381
Default

Well, I can see what you're saying with babies, but I don't think it should be banned for anyone capable of making a decision. Like people here have said, everyone sees things differently, and some people might want it, even need it.
__________________
'Not that Becktionary, the Rhyming Becktionary!'- Bender Bending Rodriguez
Mykonos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 06:31 PM   #38 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tore View Post
Yes, the foreskin has important biological functions as Erica pointed out, for example being highly sensitive and allowing for non-abrasive sex. What the last part means is that the extra skin on the penis acts as a sort of buffer rolling over the shaft which for example allows for non-abrasive masturbation without lubricants. Basically, cutting the penis would impair sexual function for example when masturbating which I'm sure is deeply rooted in why the culture developed in the first place. Religions typically have problems with sexual drive.
I'm confused by what you said here. Are you saying circumcised people can't masturbate without lubricants?
midnight rain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 07:04 PM   #39 (permalink)
AWhatup Ganache?
 
Mykonos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 381
Default

I've decided that on a purely personal note, I'm voting against. I've heard... cases with... a little more than usual being taken off in the operations. I'd rather not take that risk, no matter how small it is.
__________________
'Not that Becktionary, the Rhyming Becktionary!'- Bender Bending Rodriguez
Mykonos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 09:07 PM   #40 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
Default

If I were a lady or gay, I'd definitely prefer a nice, clean rod as opposed to something that looks like it washed ashore on a beach in New Zealand.
someonecompletelyrandom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.