Lil Reese beats up girl.

14232949 · 10-29-2012, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop

I'm serious. I don't understand why the strong should be handicapped by their strength; it's part of that whole Christian worship of weakness I don't understand.

what would your reaction have been had he beat her so bad, that she died of her injuries?
Is that a case of survival of the fittest?

Rjinn · 10-29-2012, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop

Hmm. Why is there something wrong with the strong beating up the weaker? The obvious problem with doing so to a child is they're not fully mentally or emotionally developed; but, if two peers come to it, why would a Feminist be bothered by it?

I met a guy in an institution once. His best friend slept with his girlfriend. He lost it and beat his best friend into a bloody pulp. He ended up in a coma because of it. He got 3 years in jail and 6 months in an institution.

Do you understand that besides the morality of violence, there are actually severe consequences and risks of permanent and serious harm that could become of it?

No excuses because in the end, it was his decision. Good thing about the guy is that he did his time and took it with respect, understood that despite his anger, he let himself lose control and this was the result. He became such a calm guy afterwards. Really nice dude.

Edit: I'd also like to add that if you get provoked or have anger issues, it's really your problem whether you let it get to you or not. Nobody else. There's a problem with you if you're letting yourself give into cravings because you smoke, not the cigarettes'. Don't blame the woman because you can't control your dick. Don't blame the heroin because you're a junkie.

hip hop bunny hop · 10-30-2012, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unknown Soldier

I've seen some fucked up reasoning in my time, but this surely takes the biscuit. Do you really believe what I've highlighted as well? Or are you just trying to be controversial once again?

No, I'm not trying to be controversial. I don't understand this logic.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neapolitan

If a person is strong he should not behave in a selfish manner and use his strength or injure or destroy another person with malicious intent - that has nothing to do with strength/weakness but personal responsibility to act like a decent human being. To quote Stan Lee "With great power there must also come ... great responsibility!"

Do you spend you free time lecturing cheetahs on the feelings of gazelles?

edit: seriously, what's being proposed is, in effect, two different theories of dealing with disparitys in power; (1) the strong shouldn't use their strength to their own advantage, & (2) the weak shouldn't put themselves in situations wherein they rely on the good graces of the strong....

The Batlord · 10-30-2012, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neapolitan

I mean no disrespect but I don't know why you are equating a girl to "autistic or a small child." And you shouldn't underestimate a person with autism, I know someone who has autism and believe you me if he gave lil Reese' one punch in face it would had ripped lil Reese' head and spine from his body - I mean if my friend wasn't the kind soul he is.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

It's not about equality, you ****. It's about this twat using brutal violence against someone who was basically defenseless. Physically at least, this is almost the same as if he'd assaulted someone who was autistic or a small child.

It may not be a perfect analogy, but it's the idea behind the analogy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop

Hmm. Why is there something wrong with the strong beating up the weaker?

Cause it's the only thing keeping a 6'6" brick ****house from caving in your skull and taking all your stuff. This is civilization 101 we're talking here. If you don't get that, then you should go live in a shack in the woods and eat berries.

anticipation · 10-30-2012, 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

It may not be a perfect analogy, but it's the idea behind the analogy.

??? wtf i didn't say that ****.

Plankton · 10-30-2012, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop

Hmm. Why is there something wrong with the strong beating up the weaker?

Ok class, lets take out our dictionaries, and please look up the word "Sympathy". Now, who'd like to read the definition of the word "Sympathy" for me, hmm? Ok, Bunny go ahead.

Quote:

sym·pa·thy
[sim-puh-thee] plural sym·pa·thies, adjective.

noun
1.
harmony of or agreement in feeling, as between persons or on the part of one person with respect to another.

2.
the harmony of feeling naturally existing between persons of like tastes or opinion or of congenial dispositions.

3.
the fact or power of sharing the feelings of another, especially in sorrow or trouble; fellow feeling, compassion, or commiseration.

The Batlord · 10-30-2012, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anticipation

??? wtf i didn't say that ****.

Oops! I guessed I messed up the quotes. Don't know how your name got in there. That was supposed to be my quote.

anticipation · 10-30-2012, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

Oops! I guessed I messed up the quotes. Don't know how your name got in there. That was supposed to be my quote.

haha yeah i was noticing that was your quote too, weird.

Wayfarer · 10-30-2012, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop

I'm serious. I don't understand why the strong should be handicapped by their strength; it's part of that whole Christian worship of weakness I don't understand.

Oh, okay, I see now. I didn't realize that not being allowed to savagely beat people was a "handicap".

Unknown Soldier · 10-30-2012, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop

No, I'm not trying to be controversial. I don't understand this logic.

So let's get this straight, if a big mean motherfucker decides to come to your shack one day and then decides he doesn't like you and then proceeds to beat seven buckets of crap out you. Do you after regaining consciousness think 1) I feel greatly aggrieved and will report him for what he's done and get some justice done or 2) Feel greatly aggrieved but accept it, as he was stronger than you and a natural justice has been served. because the strong should always dominate the weak?