But thats what I'm saying. I have the system you do, but khfreak (for example) doesn't.

What sort of "meaningful" action is Obama going through with?

What can Obama do? Really, you think NRA aren't going to stop Obama for trying to stop some these redicilous loopholes that these fools have to go through so there is no background check. I mean seriously, there will be nothing done on this issue because NRA won't let any change happen any time soon.

Though the population of some towns pales in comparison to towns the size of L.A. The same gangs have intergrated themselves into even the most unimaginable remote areas of the United States. Smaller in numbers yes, but never the less live by the same code and moral. The town closet to me is around 80,000 and has seen everyone of these gangs I mentioned in a previous post intergrate themselves into the population. Some of which originated in prison and later continued to progressively grow into society. Some of the films start from where the gangs originated from, and continue to show how they have grown in strength and numbers to today. I only posted the first segments of each but you can youtube them yourself if you so wish. And these are only a few of them, thats not including biker gangs or other various cartels that have branched into the U.S. Point is you will never be able to police the gun trade amongst those who live outside the law. Only cripple those who do. Watch and see for yourselves the what your up against and then tell me that banning guns from honest respectable Americans is the solution.

I am against banning guns but at the same time, we need to a lot of background checking before any individual in America can get the gun. You will see that the people that want guns are those who have many problems. The responsible ones are the ones who are impacted because sadly they will be demeaned by the media. I feel for them. But we can do something to prevent people like this killer from acquiring weapons.

The NRA spends millions per year on lobbying, and because their lobbyists are so strong, I don't see the Obama administration getting as far with implementing stricter gun laws as they'd like to.

I'm not a violent person by any means, I don't even like guns. But honestly, I would like to have one for protection. I don't see anything wrong with that.

Did you watch any of the clips I posted in my last post? It speaks rather loudly as to who will control gun traded no matter what the law says.

I don't see anything wrong with that either. But it becomes a problem when the gun gets into the wrong hands. A child, a crazy mental person, etc.

What I really want to know is why this guy's mother, a ****ing kindergarten teacher, had an assault rifle in her house. You don't need an assault rifle for self protection, if that's why she owned it.

Assault rifles like that should only be reserved for military personnel and police SWAT teams. Civilians should never be able to get their hands on one.