:laughing:

I don't know what I was thinking, I blame the booze, I'm at the pub!

Gonna go ahead and list that statement as evidence about the crime involving you not being at my apartment. YOU'RE GOING DOWN, BIATCH.

Down to your crotch, like a woman should. ;)

Feel free to punish me anyway you see fit!

Am I the only one a little peeved that a thread dedicated to a horrible shooting tragedy has devolved into a gun ownership debate, and now into sex jokes?

I'm sorry to be the ******* here, but 27 people died, most of them children. This is not the place for blowjob jokes, go to the Sexual Experience thread if you want that.

Probably.

Sure. We will relocate the tail end of our very relevant discussion (Not including the blowjobs) approximately a few hundred bits to the left of the logical memory module this thread currently occupies, since it has been deemed as sacred virtual space by approximately one person in the entirety of this forum. Never again shall anyone ever post anything in this thread that remotely aggravates another individual's personal sensibilities. Because that is how we operate public space, and not getting bent out of shape about it is something we have learned many years ago and have come to respect deeply as a personal code of communication and all its complexities.

i might get a lot of flak for this, and come off as a conspiracy theorist, but i've said it before and i'll say it again: it takes a lot of time and thought to take over the world.

i think it's highly probable that these massacres are the result of MK Ultra. for those of you have never heard of it, it's a project of the american government based on mind control. it's well-documented.

what does that have to do with taking over the world? well, look what's happening in this thread, aside from the whole divide and conquer thing. it's illuminating a dichotomy in the collective consciousness. one that likely won't ever be resolved. we're always going to have people that are pro-gun, whether it be for personal defence, or for hunting or target practice or whatever. and then we're always going to have people who think that gun availability is a problem because there are sick people in the world. i personally don't think that all the people involved in these crimes are sick. i think they were manipulated by people who have done extensive research into the controlling of the human mind, and that they were directed beyond the force of their own wills to do these things so an exclusive group can begin implementing laws concerning thought crime. and that's hella dangerous. couple that with NDAA and you've got indefinite detention for anything they decide is crazy... and crazy can be the name given to anyone who goes against what society thinks of as normal.

i may have said "i believe" in there, but i shouldn't have. i just think it's likely that there's more to what's going on here than meets the eye.

Not sure how you arrived at this whole conclusion based on MK Ultra. If your point is that government is shady, I'll agree with that on the spot. But if your point is that shady government is to blame in this scenario, I simply ask what evidence you have to support that assertion, or at the very least, do you have some sort of compelling argument that extends beyond the fact that, at some point in our past, we (quite erroneously and without result) attempted to control the minds of another country.
I mean... dude, I dunno if you've ever done LSD before, but it's not that effective at controlling anything at all. I'll tell you what is effective at controlling minds.... News media. TV commercials. Mass media in general. Societal trend. Etc.
The telling thing about that is those whose minds are actually directed by that crap are the very ones who will stand up first to deny it.

I don't think there's anything wrong with aggregating information, but do you really think the majority of people are weighing all available information prior to making decisions and forming opinions, or are you wise to the fact that the large majority of them are simply reiterating what they heard from a source that appeals to their sensibilities?

If you can't answer that, you haven't been living in "this" world for very long.

I don't know why it doesn't phase me, maybe I'm too use to the personalities around here. But you are right. I don't I see the need for you to apologize, and I don't agree with FD pov:

I think that maybe there is only one member here with enough concern to speak up when neccesary that in all probability also speaks for the sentiments of other members as well.

Thread police, Po Po up in heeya

http://i820.photobucket.com/albums/z...V20/Sirens.gif