Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Would you support this proposal?
Yes 3 11.54%
No 23 88.46%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2014, 04:34 AM   #91 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
William_the_Bloody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sunnydale Cemetary
Posts: 2,093
Default

Cant' sleep, and the more I think about the hypocrisy of this bill, the more it irritates me. If you are going to ban certain sex acts on the internet than it should be because it either 1) promotes violence against women or 2) poses a significant health risk

Spanking = no

Bondage = no (but extreme bondage is often associated with captivity so this is what they're going for) The problem is that virtually every couple on the planet has played around with light bondage fun, and a large group probably with handcuffs

Watrersports = no. Peeing on someone or vice versa is an act of degradation, there is no direct violence involved, and it doesn't pose a health risk (You would have to argue the slippery slope fallacy that watersports is a gateway to scat like marijuana is to heroin)

Fisting = yes (perhaps) This is the one case were the sexual act itself could be perceived as a violent act against a woman

Squirting = F)ck no! So let me get this straight, the British government is telling women who squirt when they c)um, that their natural bodily instinct is a deviant perversion they should be ashamed of???

Facesitting = no (If anything this sexually empowers a woman)

So here is the hypocrisy

What act is not listed on here that is more violent to women, and poses a greater health risk in terms of the risk of infection? anal sex!

Why? Because David Cameron has been courting the Gay and lesbian community by enacting same sex marriage into law, and it would be politically incorrect if not & outright political suicide to ban anal sex. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for gay marriage and letting guys f)ck each other in the a$$ until the cows come home, but if your going to ban the above acts, than you need to ban anal sex to.

...and that is why this law is bull$hit! bull$hit! bull$hit!
William_the_Bloody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 04:50 AM   #92 (permalink)
Mord
 
Zhanteimi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 4,868
Default

Porn is bad for you, and yet this bill is hypocritical, since "everybody look at porn and spank da monkey at some time in their life"!
Zhanteimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 05:18 AM   #93 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
William_the_Bloody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sunnydale Cemetary
Posts: 2,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mordwyr View Post
Porn is bad for you, and yet this bill is hypocritical, since "everybody look at porn and spank da monkey at some time in their life"!
I'm not actually a consumer of porn, though I watch it now and then, and being a male I totally forgot about the issue of the objectification of women damn, damn, damn! how f)n stupidly male centered of me, maybe I should erase my comments with the edit button, though dominatrix's often argue their is female empowering porn & art as well.

I'm simply coming from the perspective of a sexual libertarian, in that the government has no place in your bedroom, and as long as its not promoting harm against another, no place in what you watch as well.
William_the_Bloody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 05:22 AM   #94 (permalink)
Mord
 
Zhanteimi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 4,868
Default

Porn is straight-up bad for you in every way--especially the effect internet porn has on your brain (from a scientific perspective, not a moral one). The problem is that everyone is full of shit and can't really say anything to stop it.
Zhanteimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 07:45 AM   #95 (permalink)
Ask me how!
 
Oriphiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: The States
Posts: 5,006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mordwyr View Post
Porn is straight-up bad for you in every way--especially the effect internet porn has on your brain (from a scientific perspective, not a moral one). The problem is that everyone is full of shit and can't really say anything to stop it.
I'm pretty sure the internet itself is more damaging to our attention spans than any specific content therein could ever be.
Oriphiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 12:55 PM   #96 (permalink)
WWWP f*cks dogs
 
Doug McClasky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 37,941
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mordwyr View Post
Porn is straight-up bad for you in every way--especially the effect internet porn has on your brain (from a scientific perspective, not a moral one). The problem is that everyone is full of shit and can't really say anything to stop it.
Who ****ing cares? I'd rather screw my brain up with porn than do 99% of the things on Earth that are beneficial to me.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvin & Hobbes
To evaluate my character my immediate pleasure is being pitted against my future greed!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle View Post
The Batlord is amazing man. He loves some fine woman and he gets horny easily. What is better than that.
Doug McClasky is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 02:08 PM   #97 (permalink)
Mord
 
Zhanteimi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 4,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oriphiel View Post
I'm pretty sure the internet itself is more damaging to our attention spans than any specific content therein could ever be.
It's a bit of both.
Zhanteimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 02:27 PM   #98 (permalink)
WWWP f*cks dogs
 
Doug McClasky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 37,941
Default

Like I said. Who cares? I've heard there are studies which actually show that violent video games can actually be somewhat desensitizing, and yet kids these days are no more pro-war than they were before Call of Duty. I also imagine women are probably doing still better than they were before internet porn. So long as the effects of video games and internet porn aren't causing any serious harm to the moral fabric of society, I'm willing to let a little entropy seep in just so the world doesn't become a place where I have to play Monopoly and jerk off to the Sears catalog.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvin & Hobbes
To evaluate my character my immediate pleasure is being pitted against my future greed!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle View Post
The Batlord is amazing man. He loves some fine woman and he gets horny easily. What is better than that.
Doug McClasky is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 02:37 PM   #99 (permalink)
Ask me how!
 
Oriphiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: The States
Posts: 5,006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
Who ****ing cares? I'd rather screw my brain up with porn than do 99% of the things on Earth that are beneficial to me.
Technically, you could argue that all human behavior is constructed around the idea of "porn", or gratification. Everything we do is simply to maintain our homeostasis. We all "get off" on doing things that benefit us, as our brain releases feel-good neuro-chemical signals to reward us. Taking up a hobby in carpentry is just as "damaging" to your brain and behavior as watching literal pornography.

Actually it's a fascinating subject, as human behavior is so varied. If our behavior is patterned around attaining homeostasis, then why do people commit suicide? Why do some people shame themselves? How could such actions possibly gratify us? It gets into complex issues, like the level of human intelligence and our existence as social creatures creating a kind of "group-existence" that overrides individual existence. Also, there's the idea that our high levels of intelligence are able to alter the basic idea of what "survival" is, on a level where we consider normally detrimental behavior to be beneficial...

Oh wow. Did I just write all of that? Huh. Well anyway, to sum it all up, life is a wank. Enjoy it.
Oriphiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2014, 02:39 PM   #100 (permalink)
Mord
 
Zhanteimi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 4,868
Default

Your theory doesn't support all the things people do, out of duty or sacrificial love, that aren't enjoyable.
Zhanteimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



2003-2019 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.