Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
With regard to the validity of our voting process -
I don't know how I've just seen this testimony for the first time, but here is programmer Clint Curtis testifying under oath that Rep. Tom Feeney (R-Florida) asked his then-employer to write software to alter votes on electronic voting machines for the 2001 Bush election. The code swings votes 51-49 for a candidate, ensures votes match between the master tally and the individual machines, and can "eat itself" to be undetectable. If this is true... what the hell hope do we have? |
Quote:
|
The entire voting process is all about the illusion of choice that you are making a difference but you aren't really when it comes to the National stage. Vote in your local elections though, those are usually super close and you can see the direct impact almost right away based on who gets voted in as say a mayor or city council member position.
|
Thats a frigging politburo...what you just described Dre.
|
Politburo?
|
Its where the hand behind the two parties wheels out your 2 choices to pick from when they have the same agenda...Soviet system of voting. It worked so well in Russia we thought wed try it here.
|
Don't act like it hasn't been like that since the beginning.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:07 PM. |
© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.