Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   The many benefits of a child-free life (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/73237-many-benefits-child-free-life.html)

The Batlord 12-07-2013 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rezdaddy Longlegs (Post 1392823)
Great image. Baby throws up in Bl's mouth, BL retaliates by throwing up in babies mouth. Like a couple of baby birds.

http://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lp...p3doo1_500.gif

http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lb...ho1_r1_500.gif

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lh9l7zqShg1qcfzx1.gif

Lord Larehip 12-07-2013 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burning Down (Post 1391114)
A deaf person's other 4 senses are extremely heightened, to make up for the lack of hearing. Feeling of sound (feeling the vibrations) in deaf people is actually sensed by the area of the brain normally used to process sound waves picked up by the ears. The brain then attaches emotions to this. From a study done at the University of Washington:

Brains of deaf people rewire to ‘hear’ music | UW Today

My absolute favourite example of deafness and music perception and composition is Beethoven. A lot of his later works make extensive use of lower frequency notes (heavy bass), and now we understand that he did this because he could "feel" those notes better than pitches of a higher frequency. Beethoven, after his hearing was completely gone, had chopped the legs off his piano so that he could compose music whilst laying on the floor to feel the notes, because he couldn't hear them. Symphonies 8 and 9 were composed in this fashion. Beethoven worked on the 9th Symphony for 7 years, from 1817 until 1824, due to his complete deafness. He also worked on choral parts for this symphony (like the Ode to Joy chorus).

Symphony 8



Symphony 9, Movement 4 (you probably already know this one but here it is). You'll notice heavier bass in this piece.



The unfortunate part is that Beethoven did not get to hear his own compositions. He had no idea what they sounded like, if they were great or disastrous. He only saw the music on paper.

Yes, but composers back then had the ability to hear the music as the read it--a skill that is diminishing. Look at Joplin, he would ride trains through the countryside and write that way--never at the piano. Mozart supposedly did not write at the piano or harpsichord either. Gershwin wrote "Rhapsody in Blue" while riding on a train and incorporated the rhythm of the train passing over the tracks into the piece. Beethoven, despite being deaf, could probably hear the music in his head as he wrote it.

Burning Down 12-07-2013 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Larehip (Post 1392894)
Yes, but composers back then had the ability to hear the music as the read it--a skill that is diminishing. Look at Joplin, he would ride trains through the countryside and write that way--never at the piano. Mozart supposedly did not write at the piano or harpsichord either. Gershwin wrote "Rhapsody in Blue" while riding on a train and incorporated the rhythm of the train passing over the tracks into the piece. Beethoven, despite being deaf, could probably hear the music in his head as he wrote it.

I didn't say that he couldn't, but being able to hear the pitches in your head is not the same as hearing them from the instrument.

Scarlett O'Hara 12-09-2013 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burning Down (Post 1392895)
I didn't say that he couldn't, but being able to hear the pitches in your head is not the same as hearing them from the instrument.

Lord:

http://thechive.files.wordpress.com/...pg?w=500&h=375

Burning Down 12-09-2013 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla (Post 1393432)

:laughing:

ladyislingering 12-28-2013 02:21 PM

top 10 things that would piss me off on a daily basis if I had a child:

10. Their booger-encrusted face.
09. Their endless amounts of dribbling slobber.
08. Trying to dress them with their spastic limbs.
07. Feeding their ridiculously uncoordinated mouth.
06. Vomit. Anywhere. Anytime.
05. Piss/shit on everything. Their general disgusting child-stench.
04. The fact that I would never sleep again, probably.
03. The excess flab on my body from that ungrateful little troll.
02. The noises it would make. All of them.
01. Elmo. He isn't even a real Muppet. He's an "anything Muppet".

Janszoon 12-28-2013 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladyislingering (Post 1399649)
top 10 things that would piss me off on a daily basis if I had a child:

10. Their booger-encrusted face.
09. Their endless amounts of dribbling slobber.
08. Trying to dress them with their spastic limbs.
07. Feeding their ridiculously uncoordinated mouth.
06. Vomit. Anywhere. Anytime.
05. Piss/shit on everything. Their general disgusting child-stench.
04. The fact that I would never sleep again, probably.
03. The excess flab on my body from that ungrateful little troll.
02. The noises it would make. All of them.
01. Elmo. He isn't even a real Muppet. He's an "anything Muppet".

What's an "anything Muppet"?

ladyislingering 12-28-2013 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1399657)
What's an "anything Muppet"?

It was a term used by Jim Henson's workshop to describe a Muppet that was essentially interchangeable, blank in appearance and easy to dress into any character for any scene, meant to be used in "crowds" of Muppets. Essentially they were meant to be nobodies. Which is exactly what Elmo was and suddenly he has a name and he's just the greatest thing ever. WTF.

Janszoon 12-28-2013 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladyislingering (Post 1399658)
It was a term used by Jim Henson's workshop to describe a Muppet that was essentially interchangeable, blank in appearance and easy to dress into any character for any scene, meant to be used in "crowds" of Muppets. Essentially they were meant to be nobodies. Which is exactly what Elmo was and suddenly he has a name and he's just the greatest thing ever. WTF.

Interesting. I guess that makes more of an underdog character though, not part of the Muppet royalty.

ladyislingering 12-28-2013 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1399660)
Interesting. I guess that makes more of an underdog character though, not part of the Muppet royalty.

Exactly. Certain Muppets are deserving of Muppet royalty status.

Elmo is not. He ranks up there with that annoying rabbit from A Muppet Christmas Carol (I think that's the right one?).


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:02 AM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.