| Neapolitan |
12-26-2013 11:10 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by djchameleon
(Post 1398183)
how are the allegations credible when they weren't enough to get him convicted?
|
Why spend 35 million if there was nothing there to get him in trouble?
That could go either way, but paying out settlements doesn't make the party who makes a claim guilty. Not having sufficient evidence doesn't make a person guilty or not guilty. A guilty person can be let free on insufficient evidence and a innocent can be wrongfully convicted. The legal system isn't 100% mistake free. I'm not basing my opinion on that one case.
Quote:
Originally Posted by djchameleon
(Post 1398183)
Also have you not seen the information about how they just wanted money out of him?
They were trying to scam him like a mother****er for being eccentric.
|
If you don't believe those claims aren't true, then why wasn't it grown women going after his money, why all teenage boys?
Yes, Michael Jackson was eccentric, he believed he could had a sit down with Adolf Hitler and make him change his mind. The guy wasn't all there. But eccentricities are not in question. It's about his perverted dealing with young male children. Adrian McManus, Blanca Francia, Mark Quindoy, Wade Robson, & Anthony Pellicano (besides those who claim to be victimize by MJ) all came out and said he did those things.
You are free to believe what you want, or ignore what you want.
I'm done with this. |
