|
Quote:
Idk where I stand on the ****ing(probably somewhere in the middle). I'm generally open-minded about letting people do whatever the **** they please as long as it's not harmful to others but without knowing the affects it would have on an animal I can not answer. I love animals but I'm even on the fence about keeping them as pets. I think we impose to much of our **** on nature. I guess it's a little late for dogs since the species as a whole has become so dependent on humans to survive. |
Nonconsensual sex isn't wrong just because, it's wrong most importantly because it causes severe emotional trauma on the victim. If it didn't then people wouldn't make such a big fuss about it. If it can be shown that sex with an animal causes similar emotional trauma then obviously it's immoral. If not, then using human standards where they don't apply is irrational.
And if you're going to say that an animal can't legally give consent to sexual intercourse, then at the very least dog breeders are committing a form of rape by having two animals mate, and if you take it far enough animals in general shouldn't be allowed to mate with each other in the same way that two six-year-olds aren't allowed to have sexual intercourse. The only thing that might apply off the top of my head is if you can show that a species of animal would be able to contract an STD from a human being, and even then it would only make sense on a species to species basis. Icky does not equal immoral. |
Quote:
|
What is MAL?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
John is not ok because it's nasty, NASTY. When was the last time you saw a bovine and said, "mmmm look at those utters" |
Quote:
|
I once watchrd a video, as to what appeard as painful intercourse, was actually a good thing to the receiver so it turns out.
Immoral thing to do with a stud horse in my book. |
|
*resists the urge to post .gif of dolphin ****ing a headless fish*
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:00 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.