How about just realizing the fact that having eating food for nourishment isn't the same as bestiality?

This is pretty simple, just don't **** something that isn't your own species.

You weren't meant to pro-create with them and it isn't natural so it's morally wrong.

Really? You're going with that? You're also arguing against vegetarianism then, since we have canines. Hell, you're arguing against homosexuality, since we're not "meant" to procreate with our own gender. You're confusing biology with morality.

I seriously have yet to hear an argument against my and JWB's positions that doesn't amount to either, "It's icky, so therefore it's wrong," or inconsistent claims about consent. Rationalizing cultural taboos is not a legitimate logical argument, and if you're worried about consent then the entire concept of a pet is abusive. Not to mention commercial uses for animal products.

Its nothing like homosexuality Bats ..That is a stretch.
Same gender ok whatever floats yer boat.
Animals are not the same species.. ..

So its not Icky then? The short answer is no. The long answer is get the **** away from my animals freakshow.

DJ's point was that we were not "meant" to mate with animals. We are likewise not "meant" to mate with people of our own gender. I was pointing out a logical inconsistency, not comparing the act of bestiality with the act of homosexuality. I think it illustrates the intellectual laziness that a lot of people here are using just because this isn't the kind of issue that's easy to feel good being open-minded about.

Dude there aint no open mindedness on this topic for me.Bestiality turn my stomach.

I'm sure we can find somebody who will agree with this fixed statement. You can't just say something is wrong because you think it's gross. That's a subjective, aesthetic opinion that has no place in a logical discussion on morality.

I might be old fashioned but laying pipe in an animal has just never been an option.

So did you vote yes or was it Booth? LOL