![]() |
Science was around before the honkys hit the scene
|
Quote:
The study of human evolution. And differences between cultures, biologically and culturally. And how diverse the human race is. And to see what those differences and similarities are. The term was not racist for the time, but anything related to the word negro has gained the capacity to be used as a slur because times have changed. It sounds racist to you because of cultural norms that have stigmatized words relating to racial slurs, regardless of their original use and intent. So please stop bashing science. |
Science can suck it. Racist son of a bitch.
|
My point is its important for everyone to be open minded and not be bias. Its easy for someone who is part of the "majority" to say "Oh that is not a racial slur its a scientific term." They wouldn't know because they haven't been called it.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Did you even read what I said? |
Quote:
i mean even if you go below the level of species, as i said earlier, into sub-species, there aren't distinct human genetic groups that we can classify in this way. so i don't disagree that you can roughly group people into races based on physical characteristics. but those groups are only significant to us because our tribal instincts latch on to these physical discrepancies as an easy way to categorize other humans. Quote:
|
My bad, in the past I had only seen analogies where both situations were 100% identical to one another. I should have gone for that.
Quote:
Quit being so damned racist, Soulflower. |
Quote:
But regardless the technical terminology of the word, I still believe science is discriminatory against minorities. I study a social science so I know this. Also, I am not interpreting the word as "racist" I have seen it used a racial slur. |
Looks like we owe a lot to muslims though https://explorable.com/who-invented-...entific-method
and even everyone else http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History...entific_method |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:04 AM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.