Music Banter
Page 33 of 41 « First 233132 33 3435 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   Do you find being called "black" offensive? (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/78858-do-you-find-being-called-black-offensive.html)

Soulflower 03-04-2015 04:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls (Post 1560226)
The beauty of not using absolutes.. he said "not necessarily", that doesn't mean NOT, as Soulflower put it.

Boo please, his arguments implied that he felt since it was a scientific term that it was not a racial slur.

Frownland 03-04-2015 04:33 PM
Oh! So you do know what imply means! I had no idea.

Soulflower 03-04-2015 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1560220)
Wh...What? Do you learn about concepts taught in psychology classes in a history course? Or the same things taught in a criminology course as a sociology course? What about linguistics and economics? Yet all of these things are social sciences.

Social science is an umbrella term, don't push a study into the rain just because it's not identical to the ones that you're the most familiar with.

I'm still wondering why you brought it up as a way to prove that science is racist though. Before you say "oh I didn't say that", you did not directly say this but rather implied it quite strongly (implying something is saying it without bluntly stating it).

I am not sure why you made this post when I pretty much said the same thing in my last post.

I think I did a good job in detail explaining why I brought it up in my last post.

DwnWthVwls 03-04-2015 04:33 PM
I'm pretty sure he understands and recognizes how it can be used as a racial slur but that really doesn't negate it's lack of racial bias when speaking scientifically.

Surell 03-04-2015 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1559830)
I do believe that "negroid" has been replaced by "congoid", but I'm assuming that's more for political correctness. Same idea though, and since it's a scientific term rather than a racist or eugenic one then it shouldn't matter.
remember when phrenology was a science and according to it black people had dumber heads.

Soulflower 03-04-2015 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1560230)
Oh! So you do know what imply means! I had no idea.

I stand by the fact that he did not think the term was a racial slur. I would not have argued it down otherwise.

Frownland 03-04-2015 04:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower (Post 1560231)
I am not sure why you made this post when I pretty much said the same thing in my last post.

I think I did a good job in detail explaining why I brought it up in my last post.
So you'll agree that communications is a social science then? Great.

Please explain why science is racist and why your involvement in a social science affirms that. I'm still not seeing where you're getting at with that.

Soulflower 03-04-2015 04:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls (Post 1560232)
I'm pretty sure he understands and recognizes how it can be used as a racial slur but that really doesn't negate it's lack of racial bias when speaking scientifically.

YOU say that but he did not state that himself in any of his posts.

You saying "your pretty sure he means" really does not justify any of his posts if he can not articulate that himself.

Frownland 03-04-2015 04:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower (Post 1560236)
You saying "your pretty sure he means" really does not justify any of his posts if he can not articulate that himself.
My goodness the irony here is overwhelming.

Soulflower 03-04-2015 04:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1560235)
So you'll agree that communications is a social science then? Great.

Please explain why science is racist and why your involvement in a social science affirms that. I'm still not seeing where you're getting at with that.

Baby you are not reading my posts.


I said that you came with the receipts that Communications IS a social science, I admitted you were RIGHT!?!?!


Did you miss that post????


Here it is for you again

Quote:
The receipts were given and Communications is a social science however that doesn't mean you learn the same social scientific theories as psychology or even a family students degree. Its very different in that respect.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:05 PM.
Page 33 of 41 « First 233132 33 3435 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.