Do you find being called "black" offensive? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2015, 04:30 PM   #321 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls View Post
The beauty of not using absolutes.. he said "not necessarily", that doesn't mean NOT, as Soulflower put it.

Boo please, his arguments implied that he felt since it was a scientific term that it was not a racial slur.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 04:33 PM   #322 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default

Oh! So you do know what imply means! I had no idea.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 04:33 PM   #323 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
Wh...What? Do you learn about concepts taught in psychology classes in a history course? Or the same things taught in a criminology course as a sociology course? What about linguistics and economics? Yet all of these things are social sciences.

Social science is an umbrella term, don't push a study into the rain just because it's not identical to the ones that you're the most familiar with.

I'm still wondering why you brought it up as a way to prove that science is racist though. Before you say "oh I didn't say that", you did not directly say this but rather implied it quite strongly (implying something is saying it without bluntly stating it).

I am not sure why you made this post when I pretty much said the same thing in my last post.

I think I did a good job in detail explaining why I brought it up in my last post.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 04:33 PM   #324 (permalink)
Fck Ths Thngs
 
DwnWthVwls's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
Default

I'm pretty sure he understands and recognizes how it can be used as a racial slur but that really doesn't negate it's lack of racial bias when speaking scientifically.
__________________
I don't got a god complex, you got a simple god...

Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor View Post
I'd vote for Trump
DwnWthVwls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 04:33 PM   #325 (permalink)
Master, We Perish
 
Surell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
I do believe that "negroid" has been replaced by "congoid", but I'm assuming that's more for political correctness. Same idea though, and since it's a scientific term rather than a racist or eugenic one then it shouldn't matter.
remember when phrenology was a science and according to it black people had dumber heads.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhateverDude View Post
Laser beams, psychedelic hats, and for some reason kittens. Surrel reminds me of kittens.
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits
Spoiler for guess what:
|i am a heron i ahev a long neck and i pick fish out of the water w/ my beak if you dont repost this comment on 10 other pages i will fly into your kitchen tonight and make a mess of your pots and pans
Surell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 04:33 PM   #326 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
Oh! So you do know what imply means! I had no idea.

I stand by the fact that he did not think the term was a racial slur. I would not have argued it down otherwise.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 04:34 PM   #327 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower View Post
I am not sure why you made this post when I pretty much said the same thing in my last post.

I think I did a good job in detail explaining why I brought it up in my last post.
So you'll agree that communications is a social science then? Great.

Please explain why science is racist and why your involvement in a social science affirms that. I'm still not seeing where you're getting at with that.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 04:34 PM   #328 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls View Post
I'm pretty sure he understands and recognizes how it can be used as a racial slur but that really doesn't negate it's lack of racial bias when speaking scientifically.

YOU say that but he did not state that himself in any of his posts.

You saying "your pretty sure he means" really does not justify any of his posts if he can not articulate that himself.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 04:36 PM   #329 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower View Post
You saying "your pretty sure he means" really does not justify any of his posts if he can not articulate that himself.
My goodness the irony here is overwhelming.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 04:39 PM   #330 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
So you'll agree that communications is a social science then? Great.

Please explain why science is racist and why your involvement in a social science affirms that. I'm still not seeing where you're getting at with that.

Baby you are not reading my posts.


I said that you came with the receipts that Communications IS a social science, I admitted you were RIGHT!?!?!


Did you miss that post????


Here it is for you again

Quote:
The receipts were given and Communications is a social science however that doesn't mean you learn the same social scientific theories as psychology or even a family students degree. Its very different in that respect.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.