You've certainly implied that I and the rest of the forum are racist on several occasions all over the forum, so please excuse me if for "misinterpreting" you. And just because you were offended by something I said doesn't mean my posts have been biased or "outrageously offensive". Should I apologize for not tailoring my points in a way that makes you feel warm and fuzzy? If my opinions bother you then that's your problem, not mine. Deal with it.

He did not say this originally.

He finally said this after 8 pages of going back in forth.

You don't have to tell me anything you can go ahead and continue to kiss his ass.

I know what he did and did not say.

I am not stupid. I would not have argued this long if he did not believe strongly that the world could not be viewed as a racial slur.

I'm not kissing anyone's ass. I defended you a few pages back with the communications topic. I'm calling it as I see it.

You are..... because your making it seem like that was his first post and we have been arguing 8 pages deep and most of his posts have been the opposite.

So clarification after the fact counts for nothing?

It was vague (he technically did not clarify anything) and you interpreted it as him understanding the difference but whatever I don't care to go back in forth with some of you posters on the topic anymore.


Thanks Frownland for the intelligent insightful responses.

Good god. After page upon page of ignoring arguments about the word's scientific relevance she finally admits that we were right all along, and now that she has no more rope to hang herself with she's been reduced to petty personal attacks. I'm just gonna chalk this one up to a win for cracker science.

Apparently not.

These questions have already been clarified already.