Socialism - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Do you like socialism? (explain reasons in thread)
Yes 17 58.62%
No 11 37.93%
I'm confused 1 3.45%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-20-2021, 05:45 PM   #441 (permalink)
Certified H00d Classic
 
Anteater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bernie Sanders's yacht
Posts: 6,129
Default

The "real" socialism that conservatives love to demonize is great. The problem is that people will inevitably gravitate towards hierarchies after a generation or two when decision-making power gets consolidated at some level, leading to wealth consolidation as well. Plus people like their mass-produced trinkets and the instant gratification of walking into a restaurant or coffee place and having another human serve them. That's why we can't have nice things like a revolution.
__________________
Anteater's 21 Fav Albums Of 2020

Anteater's Daily Tune Roulette

Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk
I was called upon by the muses for greatness.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
I'm bald, ja.

Last edited by Anteater; 08-20-2021 at 08:36 PM.
Anteater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 06:26 PM   #442 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
jadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: dont ask
Posts: 1,231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anteater View Post
The "real" socialism that conservatives love to demonize is great.
What is it then? What's the system of governance? What model of political power does it operate on?
jadis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 07:11 PM   #443 (permalink)
Certified H00d Classic
 
Anteater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bernie Sanders's yacht
Posts: 6,129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jadis View Post
What is it then? What's the system of governance? What model of political power does it operate on?
Basically this - Wikipedia - Revolutionary Catalonia

I've also see a lot of advocacy for more communities like Marinaleda, but since they still allow private enterprise it wouldn't sit well with the anarchist types. The Guardian - Spain's communist model village
__________________
Anteater's 21 Fav Albums Of 2020

Anteater's Daily Tune Roulette

Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk
I was called upon by the muses for greatness.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
I'm bald, ja.
Anteater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 07:56 PM   #444 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jadis View Post
If co-op implies a power-sharing arrangement where there is no hierarchy and no one is sovereign, do those really exist in China?
It's a business owned by the employees. It can still have a hierarchy as managers and paygrades can be voted on. It doesn't really require socialism. It's just that capitalism tends toward strict hierarchies and ownership by one or a limited amount of people.

Quote:
I honestly know very little about China and most of the time have no idea what people mean nowadays when they say "socialism", it can refer to literally anything: "the opposite of America" or "labor unions" or "everything I was taught to be afraid of" or "Stalin's USSR" or "Nancy Pelosi" or "Scandinavian social democracy" or "an anarchist commune" or "the Parisian decadence of the satanic pedophile Michel Foucault" or "literally Hitler", depending on what image has a grip on the speaker's imagination.
You sound angry. Are you okay? If you know what Marxism and anarcho syndicalism are then I'm sure you know that Nancy Pelosi does not qualify. So exactly what axe are you grinding?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 08:42 PM   #445 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
jadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: dont ask
Posts: 1,231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
You sound angry.
No, not at all, I wrote that bit cause I thought it was amusing in a "funny cause it's true" kinda way...

But beyond the obvious absurdity of most of the usages I cited, I don't think talk of "true" socialism or the "true meaning" of the word socialism will get you anywhere. There are too many different models, many of them at loggerheads with one another, an enormous number of specific factors involved in each case etc and so forth.

On some accounts it's synonymous with Marxism, on others with one of the countless strands of anarchism, on others still with post-WWII Keynesianism etc. How does one pick which one is the privileged version?
jadis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2021, 06:47 PM   #446 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

Some parts of society are better when regulated in a more socialist manner, like when greed might possibly interfere with the service, like health services, education or policing.

Some parts of society are better off by regulated capitalism as it creates innovation, motivation, and a potential bettering through competition and natural selection. Services or products like restaurants, construction companies or the manufacturing of cars.

Somewhere between the two, there's a winning combination.
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 01:59 PM   #447 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,216
Default

And burn ever restaurant that isn't a roach infested hole-in-the-wall.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 03:41 PM   #448 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
jadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: dont ask
Posts: 1,231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor View Post
the "true" meaning of socialism will always be as simple as "those who work in the factories ought to own them"
The view I represent, at least for the sake of this conversation, is as follows: the Marxian critique of capitalist exploitation and, more broadly, of capitalism is for the most part hard to argue with.

The problem with Marxism is the lack of theory of political power, or a theory of governance. What happens after the bourgeois rule of the factory owners and their elected representatives is overturned is that the power structure defaults to being centralized in the hands of the very, very few, and the bit where they spread it around later never arrives. What you get is a society defined not by competition, neither by collaboration, but by coercion, a coercion that, if nothing else, is at least much more blatant and visible than the economic coercion by the so-called invisible hand of capital.

This is why I'm talking about power structures rather than economic systems. If an able Marxist can dismantle this argument, great. I'm all for minimizing misery and not so sure about the bit where immutable human essence dictates that we all desire Mcnuggets in the suburbs.
jadis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 03:56 PM   #449 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,216
Default

I'm no expert on Marxism but my impression is that what you're describing as Marxism is specifically Marxist-Leninism. The vanguard party and such. I'm really not down with that which is why I relate more to anarchism but I'm pretty agnostic on methods of change and the form society will take as we're essentially trying to predict how capitalism will shake out and nobody really knows how that will happen. My firm beliefs are anti-capitalism and anti-hierarchy but other than that I'm mostly coping with reality with guillotine jokes.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2021, 04:36 PM   #450 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
jadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: dont ask
Posts: 1,231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
I'm no expert on Marxism but my impression is that what you're describing as Marxism is specifically Marxist-Leninism.
On the one hand, yes, clearly: the authors I'm most familiar with on this topic wrote with the USSR in mind. But those same authors (Raymond Aron, François Furet, Pierre Rosanvallon) would probably make the following argument: the governance-shaped lacuna, the absence of theory of political power, is there in Marx whether you push for an armed revolution with all the fanaticism of a Lenin or go the other route (let's pretend I know what that is).

Another, not unrelated, critique of Marx is that he thought in teleological terms. In other words, he pretended to have discovered the universal mechanism of history and saw every event as a step in the march toward the inevitable horizon. Those who make this critique are likely to describe history as determined by multiple factors, random, unpredictable, contradictory, opaque, given to multiple interpretations and so forth, rather than defined by the "monotone" theme of class struggle.

This view has its merits in my opinion. Whether those involved in political struggles today can dispense with capitalism's greatest critic is another question, and one I'm spectacularly unqualified to even begin to ponder.
jadis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.