Music Banter
Page 4 of 5 « First 23 4 5
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   Which presidental candidate do you side with (according to the test)? (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/82798-presidental-candidate-do-you-side-according-test.html)

Xurtio 07-11-2015 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1613697)
Again, a bit disturbing.
Interesting. Why?

FaSho 07-12-2015 05:11 AM
sanders 76%

kind of disappointing I have to vote for a candidate I only agree with on 3/4ths of the issues...gotta love the two-party system!

bush and christie were the highest scoring republicans which is no surprise.

Trollheart 07-12-2015 05:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1613703)
Tl;dr

Get laid dude.
Ah come on. If that was too long, what chance has Lord Larehip got? That wasn't a wall of text, and JWB (Presidential Campaign pending) made some good points. You should read it, if you haven't already, instead of just dismissing it out of hand. TBH, most times I think the "tl;dr" response is very annoying. If someone goes to the trouble of writing a lot of stuff in response to a question or position you have, you should at least do them the courtesy of reading it. It's just rude otherwise imo.

Isbjørn 07-12-2015 06:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1613703)
Tl;dr

Get laid dude.
Ah, c'mon, JWB does have some points.

Chula Vista 07-12-2015 08:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth (Post 1613705)
lol

give me a break, chula. you read every word like it was scripture and you know it.
I actually did. Ya didn't have to drag Brady into it.


Quote:
i do have to say though, the fact that you're retreating into the "war on women" bs really demonstrates for me the full extent of your brainwashing
First off, I don't see Clinton using her womanhood at all. She's old and not attractive - it wouldn't do her any good if she was. Someone like Nikki Haley could pull that **** off.

Secondly, what's with the brainwashing? Clinton aligns with my ideologies. As does Sanders. How is that brainwashing? You using that word is just as bad as me using misogyny.

Lastly, go post in the Snog, shag, or marry thread just for the hell of it.

Xurtio 07-12-2015 08:56 AM
Strawman on the using her womanhood retort. The argument is that she's using the fact that she's an oppressed class of citizen, not shaking her hips and discretely releasing sex tapes.

I don't know if the argument is true (I haven't heard from Clinton at all) but I figure it's best to argue on the merits so the discussion doesn't get derailed.

Chula Vista 07-12-2015 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xurtio (Post 1613821)
The argument is that she's using the fact that she's an oppressed class of citizen.
But is she? Got any examples? From what I see it's her detractors who are making it such a big deal and not actually her.

Xurtio 07-12-2015 10:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1613843)
But is she? Got any examples?.
Did you read the rest of my post? I'm just talking about arguing on merits. I'm otherwise ignorant of specific he said she said stuff with politicians.

Chula Vista 07-12-2015 11:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xurtio (Post 1613878)
I'm otherwise ignorant of specific he said she said stuff with politicians.
Sorry. You did lead with the "She's doing it" bit and that's what I responded to.

Xurtio 07-12-2015 11:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1613882)
Sorry. You did lead with the "She's doing it" bit and that's what I responded to.
I actually led with "The argument is that...", but I desist, apology accepted.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:49 AM.
Page 4 of 5 « First 23 4 5
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.