Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   hillary clinton 4 prez (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/86583-hillary-clinton-4-prez.html)

Chula Vista 10-11-2016 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 1755599)
I think it's mostly because she has the media on her side. They might mention it but it isn't the main focus and they aren't constantly talking about it.

Fox News has the largest viewership of any TV opinionated news network. Rush Limbaugh has a huge audience. Breitbart has become one of the most popular websites on the internet. The media cuts both ways.

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 1755632)
He has made racists comments from the beginning of his campaign.

I truly believe Trump is racist. Having your staff make sure there's no blacks around when you visit one of your casinos says it all. And if you can't agree that he's made racist statements you at least have to agree that it's lurking just beneath the surface of a lot of his comments. Like going out of your way to point out the black person at one of your rallies:

"Look at my African American over there!"

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1755669)
I'm blaming the media for taking tiny, insignificant statements and holding them up as mountains of evil when they have more than enough mud to sling at Trump without having to resort to sensationalism.

Thing is Trump supporters don't care about mud (facts).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1755724)
I can't believe that people are so stupid that I'm driven to defend Trump.

We're not stupid. You just like to argue with the majority opinion all the time. Be it politics, music, movies, etc.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwertyy (Post 1755802)
“He’s a Mexican,” Trump told CNN of Curiel.

No. He's an American. Trump's grandfather was born in Germany. "He's a Nazi," Chula told CNN of Trump.

The Batlord 10-11-2016 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 1755823)
Using reliable sources for an argument that is substantial sure but asking for sources to a question that's so plainly obvious and having to do extra research for someone that doesn't care enough or pay attention enough to see what has been going on for months is a difference.

Why would it ever be acceptable to use evidence that was bull****?

Key 10-11-2016 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1755821)

And what did Ki give him? Bull**** clickbait.

Huffington Post isn't clickbait you retard.

Frownland 10-11-2016 12:31 PM

^LOLPOCALYPSE

Ki, you simply cannot be this stupid.

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 1755823)
Using reliable sources for an argument that is substantial sure but asking for sources to a question that's so plainly obvious and having to do extra research for someone that doesn't care enough or pay attention enough to see what has been going on for months is a difference.

So it's probably best to at least use good evidence, isn't it? Giving him garbage is only going to perpetuate his "ignorance."

Key 10-11-2016 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1755831)
^LOLPOCALYPSE

Ki, you simply cannot be this stupid.

Explain. What would you consider a reliable source of information?

djchameleon 10-11-2016 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1755829)
Why would it ever be acceptable to use evidence that was bull****?

It's acceptable when the person is question is being lazy, I'm not going to bust my ass to go above and beyond for someone that's being lazy.

Key 10-11-2016 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1755829)
Why would it ever be acceptable to use evidence that was bull****?

Explain why it's bull****. You and Frown will throw around accusations, but I've not seen either of you provide links to prove your points, instead you choose to talk out your ass.

Frownland 10-11-2016 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ki (Post 1755832)
Explain. What would you consider a reliable source of information?

Nothing is entirely reliable, but Wall Street Journal, NPR, and Forbes all get my approval. Also, Huffington Post is basically a left-wing Breitbart in that it uses clickbait like a mother****er.

The Batlord 10-11-2016 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1755826)
We're not stupid. You just like to argue with the majority opinion all the time. Be it politics, music, movies, etc.

No, the mindless cockjuggling going on in the political threads these days is just irritating, and if we have to call you morons to get you to raise the level of your own reasoning, then it's a hilarious cross we're willing to bear.

Ol’ Qwerty Bastard 10-11-2016 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 1755817)
GTFO with your trolling. He was being lazy in asking for links to an argument that has been plain as day since the beginning of Trump's election. He could have done the same thing and googled just like I did and got better examples. I matched his effort to the argument.

Errr - no. I asked for links because just as I suspected, the evidence you gave me was filled with nonsense that only the PC police could write off as actually being racist. I'm not questioning Trump's racism, some of the stuff reporter from years ago has certainly made it evident he may be. I'm looking for things he has said since he's started running. Hillary supporters love to say all of the dirt on her is from years ago, but everything I hear people toss at Trump is the same deal. Why can't we just admit they're both pieces of **** and vote for somebody else?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:58 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.