|
Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-05-2016, 09:25 PM | #11 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
What are they going to do? Find God and do an interview? If anything is going to disprove evolution, it's the research of evolution itself.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
07-05-2016, 09:31 PM | #12 (permalink) |
Jacob Sartorius
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Dank memes
Posts: 4,033
|
How about report on an actual theory that suggests evolution might be bul****. I mean they are suppose to be experts on it. So tell me why? And this has nothing to do with god. The site that I used happens to be a creationist site. And I posted it for the mathe,antics of it. So why bring up god? It's a theory that has nothing to do with him..
|
07-05-2016, 09:35 PM | #13 (permalink) | ||
carpe musicam
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
|
Quote:
I would like to add I think if you are a "multiverseian" scientifically you can't dismiss the YEC's claim the the Earth or the universe is only 10,000 years old. It could very well be that this universe could had spun off from another universe 10,000 years ago -- if you believe in that sort of thing.
__________________
Quote:
"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº? “I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac. “If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle. "If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon "I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards |
||
07-05-2016, 09:42 PM | #15 (permalink) | ||
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
Creation research sounds like researching creation to me. Disproving evolution isn't inherently creationist, but that site is so that's why I brought it up. Regardless, if evolution is to be disproved, I think it might be more likely for it to be disproved by people who understand and research evolution, not by (painfully obviously biased) organizations that make laughably false statements like
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
||
07-05-2016, 09:54 PM | #17 (permalink) | |
carpe musicam
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
|
Well I guess creationists believe the world is up to 10,000 years old. I think that is the outside figure. My source is Wikipedia. I guess that article is written by someone who cites source material that mentions what Creationist believe.
__________________
Quote:
"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº? “I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac. “If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle. "If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon "I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards |
|
07-05-2016, 09:55 PM | #18 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
Natural selection does not select for "good" or "bad" genes. The way they present it is very misleading and suggests that they don't understand the theory that they're criticizing (typical of anti-scientific groups).
The other one is simply an assumption that can be disproved with a quick Google search if we're going to ignore massive archives of fossil records like our source has. Here's an example off of the top of my head that I remember from grade school https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppered_moth I don't want to explain what a false analogy is to you to disprove the 200 parts to a system "rationalization" they've got going on in there. Here's a link False analogy - RationalWiki You wouldn't happen to have anything from a good source that calls evolution into question? And trust me, the initial source you used is not a good one.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|