The mathematical Impossibility of Evolution - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-05-2016, 09:25 PM   #11 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blankmind View Post
Well, what?
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blankmind View Post
you're dumb for researching it.
What are they going to do? Find God and do an interview? If anything is going to disprove evolution, it's the research of evolution itself.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2016, 09:31 PM   #12 (permalink)
Jacob Sartorius
 
Blank.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Dank memes
Posts: 4,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
What are they going to do? Find God and do an interview?
How about report on an actual theory that suggests evolution might be bul****. I mean they are suppose to be experts on it. So tell me why? And this has nothing to do with god. The site that I used happens to be a creationist site. And I posted it for the mathe,antics of it. So why bring up god? It's a theory that has nothing to do with him..
Blank. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2016, 09:35 PM   #13 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
The Institute for Creation Research strikes me as one of the finer and least biased sources you can find on evolutionary matters.
They seem so credible. I definitely have to learn more about them.

I would like to add I think if you are a "multiverseian" scientifically you can't dismiss the YEC's claim the the Earth or the universe is only 10,000 years old. It could very well be that this universe could had spun off from another universe 10,000 years ago -- if you believe in that sort of thing.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2016, 09:38 PM   #14 (permalink)
Mord
 
Zhanteimi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 4,873
Default

Does it matter? ****!!
__________________
Zhanteimi

LetsTalkMusic
Zhanteimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2016, 09:42 PM   #15 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Creation research sounds like researching creation to me. Disproving evolution isn't inherently creationist, but that site is so that's why I brought it up. Regardless, if evolution is to be disproved, I think it might be more likely for it to be disproved by people who understand and research evolution, not by (painfully obviously biased) organizations that make laughably false statements like

Quote:
Natural selection is considered by evolutionists to be a sort of sieve, which retains the "good" mutations and allows the others to pass away.
Quote:
No one has ever actually observed a genuine mutation occurring in the natural environment which was beneficial
That's before we even get into the false analogy of the 200 part system that they mention. These people are not experts (in evolution). They're either charlatans, reactionaries, incredibly naive, or stupid. Be a little skeptical of the sources you use, especially when they're "skeptical" sources, since many have taken up the term when they should be calling themselves "denialist."
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2016, 09:45 PM   #16 (permalink)
Jacob Sartorius
 
Blank.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Dank memes
Posts: 4,033
Default

You say those are insane claims. Do you have a source to back it up?
Blank. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2016, 09:54 PM   #17 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blankmind View Post
You say those are insane claims. Do you have a source to back it up?
Well I guess creationists believe the world is up to 10,000 years old. I think that is the outside figure. My source is Wikipedia. I guess that article is written by someone who cites source material that mentions what Creationist believe.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2016, 09:55 PM   #18 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Natural selection does not select for "good" or "bad" genes. The way they present it is very misleading and suggests that they don't understand the theory that they're criticizing (typical of anti-scientific groups).

The other one is simply an assumption that can be disproved with a quick Google search if we're going to ignore massive archives of fossil records like our source has. Here's an example off of the top of my head that I remember from grade school
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppered_moth

I don't want to explain what a false analogy is to you to disprove the 200 parts to a system "rationalization" they've got going on in there. Here's a link
False analogy - RationalWiki

You wouldn't happen to have anything from a good source that calls evolution into question? And trust me, the initial source you used is not a good one.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2016, 10:10 PM   #19 (permalink)
kibbeh
 
kibbeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: nowhere
Posts: 648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mordwyr View Post
Does it matter? ****!!
does anything matter????
kibbeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2016, 10:21 PM   #20 (permalink)
Mord
 
Zhanteimi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 4,873
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pansy gayboy 69 View Post
does anything matter????
Most definitely.
__________________
Zhanteimi

LetsTalkMusic
Zhanteimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.