Let's Talk About Gary Johnson - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-12-2016, 11:53 AM   #1 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
The outcome of an indictment does not always reflect the reality of the crime that's being investigated.
Hillary Clinton wasn't indicted though.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2016, 11:54 AM   #2 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Cool. You know what I mean.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2016, 12:00 PM   #3 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
Cool. You know what I mean.
I really don't. In the OJ case, the police determined that a crime had been committed and used evidence to charge him with it. In Hillary's case, the FBI determined there was no crime. Pretty different scenario.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2016, 12:07 PM   #4 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

There are differences, yes. For instance, OJ was a black man, Hillary is a white woman.

However, both committed the crimes in question, and they were absolved of those crimes by legal institutions.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2016, 12:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
There are differences, yes. For instance, OJ was a black man, Hillary is a white woman.

However, both committed the crimes in question, and they were absolved of those crimes by legal institutions.
There was no crime in Clinton's case.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2016, 12:17 PM   #6 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
There was no crime in Clinton's case.
Yes there was, it was a textbook case of gross negligence. Just because the FBI said it's not does not make it so, which is what I've been getting at for a while now.

What specifically about the case do you think supports the FBI's stance?
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2016, 12:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
Yes there was, it was a textbook case of gross negligence. Just because the FBI said it's not does not make it so, which is what I've been getting at for a while now.
Actually, legally it does make it so.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
What specifically about the case do you think supports the FBI's stance?
The fact that it was investigated by people who are actual subject matter experts, which I am not. As far as I can see there's no reason to doubt their conclusion.

What specifically makes you think it's a "textbook case of gross negligence"?
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2016, 12:36 PM   #8 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
Actually, legally it does make it so.
Speaking from a perspective of facts, the FBI's ruling does not change anything.

Quote:
What specifically makes you think it's a "textbook case of gross negligence"?
Gross negligence
Quote:
carelessness in reckless disregard for the safety or lives of others, which is so great it appears to be a conscious violation of other people's rights to safety. If one has borrowed or contracted to take care of another's property, then gross negligence is the failure to actively take the care one would of his/her own property. If gross negligence is found by the trier of fact (judge or jury), it can result in the award of punitive damages on top of general and special damages.
Threatening national security threatens the safety of Americans and the fact that she used a private email server suggests that she was conscious of what she was doing.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2016, 12:49 PM   #9 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

I trust myself.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2016, 07:25 AM   #10 (permalink)
cooler commie than elph
 
Isbjørn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: In a hole, help
Posts: 2,811
Default

Could someone please explain briefly what's appealing about Gary Johnson? What is he going to do for American workers?
Isbjørn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.