Frownland |
01-28-2017 04:16 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls
(Post 1800679)
Was kind of hoping you'd actually have something to contribute to the conversation.. :rolleyes:
You can call it evidence until you're blue in the face, but the only people who know the truth are the people involved. We have no way of absolutely knowing.. I want evidence of innocence for those with reasonable motive, until then I reserve the right to be skeptical, but I don't think they should be prosecuted or anything because I support innocent until proven guilty.
Edit: You seem to think that because it's our government and not some joe shmoe court case that skepticism is irrational.
|
I'm not even sure what your perspective is, I was speaking against general talking points. I'm not exactly sure what you're asking evidence for, so you may be right. I was referring to the scientific element of the picture, like those peer reviewed things referenced in the popular mechanics article.
|