You're a real class act huh. :rofl:

Wikileaks has more credibility than most of what I've seen from you so far. After all, anyone who presents information that doesn't gel with your particular brand of paranoia HAS to be a Trump apologist. You have no trouble when someone cites anonymous sources in regards to Trump in some of the articles I've seen you share...yet you protest when I bring up Wikileaks.

He decided to follow the law only when it mattered to him playing president.

Ever hear of something called "due dilligence"? When you own a company and are thinking about partnering with another business, you are suppose to do due diligence to fully understand what your potential liabilites may be up front, and further on down the road.

I'm certain Trump's people did due diligence and decided "**** it". Lots of money to be made. Damn the torpedoes.

That doesn't really sound like anything but him not giving a **** who buys his name, which I'm pretty sure was nothing new. Trump's an unscrupulous douche, what's the scoop?

Source please.

Trump Tower Baku may be President's worst deal ever | Daily Mail Online

Read slowly.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/...8814027991.jpg

So...the same info as earlier from a worse source. Thanks.

I want a source on this that is more than bitter assumptions that he is the evil caricature that you know him as.

Google: "Trump Baku"

You'll get a ton of hits. And you don't have to revert back to your D-self once again. Things were going well. I guess you just can't help yourself.

Edit: Over half a million hits. All not relevant but tons are.

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...mp+baku+deal&*

You should consider that maybe your discussion style is genuinely bad instead of just assuming that anyone who disagrees with you is an *******.

Do you think that the Daily Mail is a good source? And do you think that the higher the number of google hits you get in a search means that the information is of a higher quality? Search Pizzagate is Real and get back to me on that.

No, you're just an *******.

Good, because it's a terrible source.

Phew, that's good that you don't think that either because that's a bandwagon fallacy and you're better than that. Not really, it's just an expression.