Potentially. Ideally. I don't know if I have enough faith in people to believe it would work out fine. I'm certainly an anarchist ethically, because I believe in the Non Aggression Policy and Universal Ethics.

But I also understand that there's no point arguing for something that isn't ever likely to happen in my lifetime, so it's best to aim for something a little closer. Gradual steps.

I wonder how many of you are hoping to have children in the future?

If you have a child in the next ten years or so, he/she might be about seventy-five in the year 2100 - and that's not so old by today's expectations.
According to this article, if carbon emissions continue at present rates, a sea-level rise of 2 metres/6 feet is possible by the year 2100.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.2a70a9f22bfb

You can click here to find maps that show the America that your child might face in his/her retirement years, though it only shows the extent of flooding. Mercifully, perhaps, it doesn't show the hoards of refugees moving inland from the coasts, which will make the recent Syrian refugee crisis in Europe look like something, er, on a smaller scale:-

https://ss2.climatecentral.org/#12/4...feet&pois=hide

If you come to my house you can **** in the garage.

I imagine an anarchic society being controlled by a psuedo goverment of crime syndicates dictating trade, politics, justice, etc. I dont think true anarchism can exist unless you use a simple definition like no official government.

You know what the NAP is. There's nothing wrong with responding to those who trespass and/or violate your property.

Also you can still have laws and prisons in a free society, they would simply be voluntarily funded. The only real laws would be for people to not violate the Non Aggression Principle, which covers pretty much any immoral act.

But as I've said I don't have enough faith in people to do this in mass. Would work better if individuals who believe in this sort of stuff created their own country.

No. And they would have violated it and therefore lawfully responsible.

I'm honestly not surprised about the sea level. Sea level here has risen by about .5 meters recently and Queensland especially has been experiencing quite a bit of flooding. I suppose we don't focus enough on climate change (even though we were climate tax happy for a while down in aussieland) and if these big corporate businesses stopped being so busy with their own inflation, perhaps they could focus on their extensive gas emissions and pollution rate. Meh, I suppose we've caught onto it now, though... but it does sound like one scary future.

Okay.

I already said it clearly violates the NAP.

^ Thank you so much for telling us about how things stand in Australia, Rjinn!
The only other poster from that area is Stephen, who alerted us to this disaster-in-the-making:-

It seems a shame if Australia, which has seen relatively little industrialization and pollution, is now destined to catch up fast with other countries.
__________________________________________________ __________________

On the topic of disappearing beaches, there is clear evidence where I live too. Here's an article which confirms the same possible sea-level rise of 6 feet which I have previously mentioned:-

Sea- level rise threatens Yucatan Peninsula, Cancun, Mexico | Global Warming Effects

If you don't want all the facts and figures, here are a couple of striking quotes:-

And here's a picture to show what's happening. The house and palm tree show the old beach level, which used to slope gently out to a sea that would've been a "safe" one or two hundred yards away. Now the sea is eating away at the sand cliff it has made. How high is the cliff? Maybe six feet? Whatever it is, the quantity of eroded sand is just mind-boggling.

http://www.beachpro.mx/img/page/fig1.png