Calls us naive. Entirely ignores implications of a bill just because it's popular among the corrupt.

Classic Frownland. When all else fails, go for the low blow. You are the one that asked for a debate dumbass.

BREAKING NEWS ALERT

You don't know everything.
Your opinions are not the end all, be all.
Your **** stinks worse than mine.
Your high opinion of yourself counts for jack **** in these conversations.

If this bill had even an ounce of potential issues at least one democrat would have puffed their feathers and voted no. And we can all agree that they have more insight than we do. Admit it Frownland.

Money. And there will be no punishment because the bill protects companies who distribute ineffective or harmful drugs.

What a naive assumption. I don't have faith in those people to be either intelligent or ethical, so I don't agree at all.

Oh well. That's the decisions grown ups make. If the treatment doesn't work I guess people will stop trying it. And maybe that would incentivise companies to make drugs that do work.

Worked for homeopathy.

The persistence of the Reiki, acupuncture, chiropractic, and supplement industry (all of which like to call themselves legitimate medicine) suggests otherwise.

See first two sentences of previous post.

Should grown ups have the right to exploit? Falsely advertise?

Right, why have any regulations then? Adults know when they're just being sold a mixture of battery acid and Axe body spray as soon as it's injected into their veins.