The Official SCOTUS Thread - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
The Official SCOTUS Thread The Official SCOTUS Thread
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-04-2017, 01:44 PM   #12 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor View Post
case by case but probably yes if the grounds for denying are discriminatory

if the guy painted portraits for weddings for whatever reason it'd be clearly yes

most wedding cakes worth anything are made on demand, that's not a good defense, but like I said he doesn't have to put a penis on it
Look beyond the context since that's how the law will be applied: can we compel artists to create things that they don't want to?
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.
Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.