MB's Own November Midterm Election - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: How will/would you vote on Nov 6?
Generic Democratic Candidate 8 47.06%
Generic Republican Candidate 2 11.76%
Other Candidate 2 11.76%
I don't vote in midterms 5 29.41%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-31-2018, 08:08 PM   #1 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
[MERIT]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 4,823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psy-Fi View Post
It seems to me that some people on the right exaggerate and hype up "voter fraud" for their own benefit as much as some people on the left exaggerate and hype up "voter suppression" for their own benefit.

I don't trust either side of the political coin on either issue.


Quote:
Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls View Post
Doesn't $50mil exist outside the US where products/services can be sold? Unless I'm missing something you'd only be correct if it was a closed system.
It IS a closed system in the sense that virtually all countries have a Rothschild-controlled central bank, rather than printing their own currency. And I guess it depends on what the people who control the Federal Reserve are willing to accept as payment.

In the old days, China would only accept gold as payment from buyers on the Silk Road. That is why they prospered.

It's defintely an interesting and intriguing topic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisnaholic View Post
I don't think that any country in the world pays their printers $100 every time they print a $100 bill. I imagine that printing charges are related to printing costs, not, as [MERIT] suggests, the face value of what they print.
I chose 5% as an example. The percentage is completely arbitrary to the point, which is apparently going over your head.

Under the current set-up, it is IMPOSSIBLE to re-pay the global debt. The amount of global currency that exists is LESS THAN the amount of currency owed to the banks that loaned that currency to the countries.

Read that twice, slowly, and let it sink in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MicShazam View Post
Ok, I'll see if I can get American citizenship in time to vote.
I'll vouch for you.

Last edited by [MERIT]; 10-31-2018 at 08:14 PM.
[MERIT] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2018, 10:21 PM   #2 (permalink)
...here to hear...
 
Lisnaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: He lives on Love Street
Posts: 4,444
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [MERIT] View Post
I chose 5% as an example. The percentage is completely arbitrary to the point, which is apparently going over your head.
^ No, I was able to understand what you meant by "say 5%", I could even understand your arithmetic, which is why I didn't comment on either item.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisnaholic View Post
I don't think that any country in the world pays their printers $100 every time they print a $100 bill. I imagine that printing charges are related to printing costs, not, as [MERIT] suggests, the face value of what they print.
^ What with the cost of ink, paper and printing machine, how much does it cost to print a $100 bill? Let's say $1. That's approximately what a government will pay a printer to make a $100 bill. The government doesn't have to pay a hundred dollars just because that is what's written on the bill. That's the part of your explanation for burgeoning government debt that I was questioning. 5% is a fine number, but isn't relevant because it's an interest rate on a loan which doesn't exist: governments don't have to borrow money from printers in order to have money printed. It's probably a very cheap process for them, compared with building a hospital or airport for example.
__________________
"Am I enjoying this moment? I know of it and perhaps that is enough." - Sybille Bedford, 1953
Lisnaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2018, 10:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
[MERIT]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 4,823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisnaholic View Post
^ No, I was able to understand what you meant by "say 5%", I could even understand your arithmetic, which is why I didn't comment on either item.



^ What with the cost of ink, paper and printing machine, how much does it cost to print a $100 bill? Let's say $1. That's approximately what a government will pay a printer to make a $100 bill. The government doesn't have to pay a hundred dollars just because that is what's written on the bill. That's the part of your explanation for burgeoning government debt that I was questioning. 5% is a fine number, but isn't relevant because it's an interest rate on a loan which doesn't exist: governments don't have to borrow money from printers in order to have money printed. It's probably a very cheap process for them, compared with building a hospital or airport for example.
The government isn't getting the currency simply for the cost of parts and labor. If the mint spends a nickel to print a $100 bill, they don't have a piece of paper worth a nickel, they have a piece of paper worth $100. The central banks who loan the currency to the governments don't view it is a 5 cent piece of paper, they view it as a $100 asset, and lend it out as so.
[MERIT] is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.