|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
Hell yeah. In fact you should have to own a gun as well as one of those t-shirt cannons they have at hockey games.
__________________
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND: https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Just Keep Swimming...
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: See signature...
Posts: 7,765
|
It tells you the same amount of information as the title of this thread.
Should felons be allowed to own guns? Well, that depends. Are they non-violent crimes? Has the person reintegrated into society favorably? Does that person have a history of violence? It's such a blanket statement for each case to case basis. In my case, they were all non-violent crimes, I have no history of violence, and I've reintegrated into society favorably. Should I be able to own a gun legally as a convicted felon? Yes. Do I want to own a gun as a convicted felon? No.
__________________
See location... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
No Ice In My Bourbon
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,329
|
Quote:
If so, what circumstances would you say necessitate that? A school shooting? A church shooting? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Like I said if we were going to go case by case the only plausible scenario I can think of is cases like domestic murder or abuse. That's the only kind of crime that typically involves a legal gun that isn't severe enough to warrant life/the death penalty. To me, mass shooters should never see the light of day, so they aren't relevant.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|