The Argument thread. (Ching)

jibber · 01-24-2006, 05:01 PM

but of course, all the information i've been putting out is all from the time immediately after the second world war. The situation has changed dramatically since then, and both sides have commited utter atrocities to the other.

franscar · 01-24-2006, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jibber

and both sides have commited utter atrocities to the other.

And both sides will always blame the other and both sides will never admit they've acted like bastards and both sides will never accept a peace which involves making sacrifices or admitting to having been bastards.

And so it goes on. And on. And on.

jibber · 01-24-2006, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by franscar

And both sides will always blame the other and both sides will never admit they've acted like bastards and both sides will never accept a peace which involves making sacrifices or admitting to having been bastards.

And so it goes on. And on. And on.

exactly, the situation has been like this for the past, what, 60, 70, 80 years? and neither side is any closer to coming to a conclusion. If anything, my opinion is that they came closest to reaching a "happy" middle right when the jews first declared statehood. Of course, after the war of independance, the situation has become so volatile and muddled that it's virtually impossible to determine who has more of a claim to the land. Of course the obvious solution would be to split it, but there's such a long history in the area that now, no matter how the country were split, both sides would lose areas that they desperately want to hang on to. funny thing, we havent even BEGUN to touch on the religious motives from either side for keeping territory.

franscar · 01-24-2006, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jibber

funny thing, we havent even BEGUN to touch on the religious motives from either side for keeping territory.

And I know this is an "argument thread", but for the sake of mankind, it's probably best we don't.

adidasss · 01-24-2006, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by franscar

And I know this is an "argument thread", but for the sake of mankind, it's probably best we don't.

don't be a fucking pacifist pussy and say what you have to say....

jibber · 01-24-2006, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by franscar

And I know this is an "argument thread", but for the sake of mankind, it's probably best we don't.

agreed, thats one of the aspects that pretty much impossible to come to an agreement over. Bothe sides have entirely equal claim to the area if you look at it from a purely religious standpoint.

adidasss · 01-24-2006, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by franscar

And both sides will always blame the other and both sides will never admit they've acted like bastards and both sides will never accept a peace which involves making sacrifices or admitting to having been bastards.

And so it goes on. And on. And on.

i would like to see how you would react if brittain was overrun by immigrants claming it was their land leaving you a minority in your own country.....i think you'd just go with it ey?

you know what i'd do if i had no money and was fighting a loosing battle against a much more powerful enemy with powerful protectors?
i would start blowing people up....

jibber · 01-24-2006, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adidasss

i would like to see how you would react if brittain was overrun by immigrants claming it was their land leaving you a minority in your own country.....i think you'd just go with it ey?

you know what i'd do if i had no money and was fighting a loosing battle against a much more powerful enemy with powerful protectors?
i would start blowing people up....

you act as though the jewish holocaust refugees were forcing the arabs out of their homes. They were being integrated into ALREADY EXISTING jewish settlements. The arabs protested mainly out of a feeling of anti-semetism.

adidasss · 01-24-2006, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jibber

you act as though the jewish holocaust refugees were forcing the arabs out of their homes. They were being integrated into ALREADY EXISTING jewish settlements. The arabs protested mainly out of a feeling of anti-semetism.

aside from the fact that at certain instances they were doing exactly that ( which i have read in the subjected article ), i wouldn't care if some other nation inhabited the most barron and lifeless areas in croatia, they would have no right to come into my country, my land, and take over....if you understand where i'm coming from...

franscar · 01-24-2006, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adidasss

you know what i'd do if i had no money and was fighting a loosing battle against a much more powerful enemy with powerful protectors?
i would start blowing people up....

Maybe you should just do that anyway instead of making vaguely aggressive posts on the internet.

Just a suggestion like...

01-24-2006, 05:01 PM	#1 (permalink)
jibber Freeskier Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople... Posts: 1,544	but of course, all the information i've been putting out is all from the time immediately after the second world war. The situation has changed dramatically since then, and both sides have commited utter atrocities to the other. __________________ What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road. William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass. HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER