Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Games, Lists, Jokes and Polls (https://www.musicbanter.com/games-lists-jokes-polls/)
-   -   What's wrong with nudity? (https://www.musicbanter.com/games-lists-jokes-polls/25069-whats-wrong-nudity.html)

Vjay 09-22-2007 07:03 PM

What's wrong with nudity?
 
Is there any reason to believe that nudity is immoral or wrong? If so, what's that reason?

jackhammer 09-22-2007 07:13 PM

No there is'nt as long as it's kept betwwen a certain age bracket!

Voice_of_the_Soul12,13,01 09-22-2007 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jackhammer (Post 399918)
No there is'nt as long as it's kept betwwen a certain age bracket!

And they have to be hot..... and female.

pheurton 09-23-2007 03:14 PM

And like golden showers.

MURDER JUNKIE 09-24-2007 03:01 AM

And long walks on the beach

DontRunMeOver 09-24-2007 04:07 AM

Ugly people make nudity wrong. For everybody else, it's very, very right.

<3_BEAUTIFUL_HELL_FAIRY_<3 09-24-2007 02:03 PM

^

going to agree with that and add my own too..........

umm well because I am still a minor I don't think this is really a subject I should touch but, I've been in more dangerous waters then this soo(sorry if that doesn't make sense) I personally think that we should be...BUT!!! to some extent.... you know like.....ummm..... almost like you work your way to completely nude like....(omg... I can't believe I am explaining this) first you have to wear pants and then so on so forth you know...but I don't think it would work over soo well because there would probably be people f_cking at work and on the streets and so on so forth..... but I think that girls should be able to not wear there shirts... okay I should restate that I think girls should be able to walk around with just a bra on....... there better.......... I will add more to this later I want to see how well this sinks in first....

jibber 09-24-2007 02:07 PM

^ Please, don't add more to that later. Go back to school; learn how to write a coherent sentence, maybe review proper grammar and sentence structure to start you off. After that, wait for a few years so you have a chance of growing out of being an idiot, then post again. At that time, your post will be reviewed, and it will be determined if you should be allowed to address the human race again.

anticipation 09-24-2007 02:46 PM

Jesus wore clothes.
Christians wore clothes.

Monkey's don't wear clothes.
Evolutionists shouldn't wear clothes.

CAPTAIN CAVEMAN 09-24-2007 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gentleman Johnny (Post 400427)
Jesus wore clothes.
Christians wore clothes.

Monkey's don't wear clothes.
Evolutionists shouldn't wear clothes.

you won.

<3_BEAUTIFUL_HELL_FAIRY_<3 09-25-2007 08:37 AM

^
^
ARE YOU SERIOUS??

okay First off I am IN SCHOOL!! second.... last time I check this wasn't a grammar checking website.... third I am not getting graded on my grammar so If you son't understand what I am getting at then I am not the one who needs to go back to school.....
I willl supoort this by showing you this

"sutdies sohw taht you can raed wthiuot the wrods in the excat odrer as lnog as the frist lteter and the lsat lteter are in the rgiht palce"

if you can read that then please shut up and leave me and my grammar alone.... soo just curious who died and made you the grammar king/queen what gender it is you are.....

DontRunMeOver 09-25-2007 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gentleman Johnny (Post 400427)
Jesus wore clothes.
Christians wore clothes.

Adam and Eve didn't wear clothes when they were doing what God told 'em though, so good christians should also be naked. Only bad christians wear clothes. The extent of your nudity shows how good you are at following God's wishes. God is, after all, a big perv.

Bane of your existence 09-25-2007 09:31 AM

Adam and Eve heathens.

anticipation 09-25-2007 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DontRunMeOver (Post 400604)
Adam and Eve didn't wear clothes when they were doing what God told 'em though, so good christians should also be naked. Only bad christians wear clothes. The extent of your nudity shows how good you are at following God's wishes. God is, after all, a big perv.

Original Sin.

The Dave 09-25-2007 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Emo_Princess_I_<3_MCR_<33 (Post 400600)
^
^
ARE YOU SERIOUS??

okay First off I am IN SCHOOL!! second.... last time I check this wasn't a grammar checking website.... third I am not getting graded on my grammar so If you son't understand what I am getting at then I am not the one who needs to go back to school.....
I willl supoort this by showing you this

"sutdies sohw taht you can raed wthiuot the wrods in the excat odrer as lnog as the frist lteter and the lsat lteter are in the rgiht palce"

if you can read that then please shut up and leave me and my grammar alone.... soo just curious who died and made you the grammar king/queen what gender it is you are.....

Just because one can type like a raging dumb ass doesn't mean that he or she should.

djchameleon 09-26-2007 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jibber (Post 400417)
^ Please, don't add more to that later. Go back to school; learn how to write a coherent sentence, maybe review proper grammar and sentence structure to start you off. After that, wait for a few years so you have a chance of growing out of being an idiot, then post again. At that time, your post will be reviewed, and it will be determined if you should be allowed to address the human race again.

harsh much?

Oh I forgot, The internet is serious business. We must all cross our ts and dot our I's. Anyone that uses internet lingo and 1337 speak should be snipered on sight also.

DontRunMeOver 09-26-2007 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gentleman Johnny (Post 400669)
Original Sin.

Yep, only after they sinned did they cover themselves up. Covering themselves up was part of the sin, as the sin made them aware of their own nudity. The naked Adam and Eve were good and pure and wonderous and didn't need to wear clothes, it was only at the point of sin that they suddenly felt the need to be clothed... so to be clothed is to be sinful! Or that's what I'm going to tell the ladies from now on.

DontRunMeOver 09-26-2007 03:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 400786)
harsh much?

Oh I forgot, The internet is serious business. We must all cross our ts and dot our I's. Anyone that uses internet lingo and 1337 speak should be snipered on sight also.

It's tough love. If people practise writing with perfect spelling and grammar on internet forums then it will be a breeze come time for exams, coursework, application forms, work correspondence and just as useful for less formal situations. If somebody practises writing ****ty typo slang instead then they're wasting a lot of time.

GravitySlips 09-26-2007 07:42 AM

Nudity is fine.

Prostitution is fine.

**** censorship of anything.

Alo 09-26-2007 07:57 AM

Vaginas and penisses are ugly, not only should people cloth them away, but ugly people should wear underwear on their heads! I don't see the problem with showing boobs though, nothing special about them (heehee).

The purpose of clothes used to be warming oneself, and for protection. Now it's mostly to feel like an individual, and hygiene.

<3_BEAUTIFUL_HELL_FAIRY_<3 09-26-2007 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dave (Post 400712)
Just because one can type like a raging dumb ass doesn't mean that he or she should.

I AM A GIRL!!!!! DUH!!!!! COME ON ARE YOU SERIOUS???? ITS SO OBVIOUS...

Alo 09-26-2007 10:33 AM

-sits in a corner and cries, as people like you shouldn't be allowed unsupervised websurfing-

The Dave 09-26-2007 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Emo_Princess_I_<3_MCR_<33 (Post 400818)
I AM A GIRL!!!!! DUH!!!!! COME ON ARE YOU SERIOUS???? ITS SO OBVIOUS...

I never said you weren't. I said, "Just because one can type....," I was attempting to be somewhat nice by not singling you out in particular, but rather everyone that types like a raging dumb ass.

But yeah, thanks for playing.

djchameleon 09-27-2007 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DontRunMeOver (Post 400791)
It's tough love. If people practise writing with perfect spelling and grammar on internet forums then it will be a breeze come time for exams, coursework, application forms, work correspondence and just as useful for less formal situations. If somebody practises writing ****ty typo slang instead then they're wasting a lot of time.

I agree with you on that one. That's probably why the kids today are writing worse than they used to. The internet is reversing the process they are learning in school then they end up using the same type of slang in formal situations when they shouldn't

right-track 09-27-2007 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GravitySlips (Post 400807)

Nudity is fine.

Prostitution is fine.

**** censorship of anything.

The irony slays me.

Son of JayJamJah 09-27-2007 11:46 AM

Indeed

DeVicci 09-27-2007 04:44 PM

Nudity is fine as long as the 320lb couple down the street are omitted from participating. That might be more than one could handle.

Inuzuka Skysword 09-30-2007 02:41 PM

Nudity isn't necessarily a problem. The problem is that so many perversions stem from it.

<3_BEAUTIFUL_HELL_FAIRY_<3 10-01-2007 07:07 AM

^ SADLY VeRy VeRy TrUe

cardboard adolescent 10-02-2007 09:39 AM

What? If either one of you would like to try explaining that, feel free.

<3_BEAUTIFUL_HELL_FAIRY_<3 10-02-2007 01:26 PM

Many Perverts


Lots Of Problems


Very Bad Thing


Not A Good Thing


Duh!!!!

cardboard adolescent 10-02-2007 02:30 PM

Okay, first of all define a pervert. Most sexual deviations are pretty harmless, and classifying them as "bad things" is simplistic and immature. Secondly, the piece I wanted explained was how nudity leads to perversions... most perversions I know of come about through boredom, curiosity, repression... they might be triggered by nudity but they're generally not caused by it.

Mouseketeer 10-02-2007 02:38 PM

Is this the beginning of an MB nudist colony?

Inuzuka Skysword 10-02-2007 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cardboard adolescent (Post 402877)
What? If either one of you would like to try explaining that, feel free.

Well if a women was walking around nude in public I would think people would start thinking all kinds of "dandy" things about her, which would take everything else off of your mind. The people that are bound to be rapists because of depression and other things will just have another "trigger" as you say to rape a woman. Plus think about all the other things you could think about besides women. If a good-looking naked woman were to walk by me I would probably start thinking about that whereas I could be thinking about something much more valuable to society.

cardboard adolescent 10-02-2007 05:31 PM

First of all, there is nothing more valuable to society than sex, because it fuels the economy and makes it so there is a society. Secondly, if everyone walked around naked all the time you'd probably get desensitized to it and not walk around with a huge erection everywhere you went. I don't think it would make sexual predators any more likely to strike, if anything it would curb their appetite. Plus, if you see some creepy guy sitting on a bench in a playground with a huge hard-on you're more likely to keep your kids away from him; similarly if some guy starts following you in a dark alley and HE's got a boner you probably know what he's in the mood for and you might pick up your pace.

anticipation 10-02-2007 05:37 PM

you people are idiots.



anyone ever think of what happens to nudist when it's winter?
they get ****ing goosebumps
and that **** aint sexy, yo.

Kevorkian Logic 10-02-2007 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cardboard adolescent (Post 402996)
First of all, there is nothing more valuable to society than sex, because it fuels the economy and makes it so there is a society. Secondly, if everyone walked around naked all the time you'd probably get desensitized to it and not walk around with a huge erection everywhere you went. I don't think it would make sexual predators any more likely to strike, if anything it would curb their appetite. Plus, if you see some creepy guy sitting on a bench in a playground with a huge hard-on you're more likely to keep your kids away from him; similarly if some guy starts following you in a dark alley and HE's got a boner you probably know what he's in the mood for and you might pick up your pace.

Interesting point, but that would be a very ****ed up world, telling your kid to stay away from the men stroking their pointy sticks.

A lot of the mystery and the passion of sex would be lost though, part of what makes sex so fun is that you get to see something special (the opposite sex's body), and if you constantly see the other gender's body, what is so special about lying on a bed with some person making out/****ing? Yes, you are still having sex, which is enough to at least get the guy off. But I honestly think it would be 100 times harder to get the girl off. Also the world would greatly favor guys with big ****s, because girls would be repelled by the guy before they got the chance to fall in "love" with their personality first.

jackhammer 10-02-2007 07:00 PM

Nostalgic Pan-Asian Kink

The world is sex as simple as that. For better or worse.theses are asian works of art from one of the more so-called sexually repressed societys. It's every living thing's nature to procreate. Nudity is to be treasured.

Kevorkian Logic 10-02-2007 07:26 PM

so if I chose to not walk around without my clothes, I will become a sexually repressed teenager who spends their time drawing pictures of orgies?

There's a difference between being nude and having sex. I'm all for having sex all the time with as many people as possible. I'm not for walking around in nude all the time--there are just some people I don't want to see nude.

jackhammer 10-02-2007 07:27 PM

^^
That would be me then-shocking stuff it is.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:37 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.