Sex Vs. Music
 

Assume sex is not neccesary for reproduction.

Well, Im probably listening to music about 5-6 hours a day. So if in turn I would be having sex for 5-6 hours a day. Thats a tough one because you cant get exhausted and drained from listening to music. And Sex will most definitely do that to you.

I chose music.

I should hope so, you're 12.

:D
Well, 14, but still. Just interested in what the older members say.

Tie.

I love sex, but without ever having heard Marvin ***e's 'Lets Get It On' the sex just wouldn't be the same.

My vote: Music

Music turns you on and you can turn on the music by just pressing a button :D

music,

purely for the fact that
you don't have to buy music dinner beforehand
or spend a weekend with music's parents
who happen to think your life choices are inadequate.

You're like 14 it's not like you have to deal with that anyway.

Why not have a bit of both. Have sex while listening to music

While it may seem utterly far fetched, I would imagine that sooner, rather than later, the sex would get kinda boring and unfulfilling, whereas music would not. So yeah, music for me.

If only Sex could be like a prog song, and go on FOREVER!!!

lol.

That's a really tough one, I must say...I think I'm gonna have to go with tie due to the fact that sex tends to be more enjoyable, but it can't go on forever, of you'd die from exhaustion...

If sex was like a prog song 95% of it would be masturbation.

Touche.

If sex were like Metal there'd be no such thing as virgin's. And if sex were like the Backstreet Boys then we would all have big red marks on our asses...Adidass would love that.

......

:-/

What, I'm a teenager. :usehead:

Anyone who didnt chose sex is either lying or never had it... Come on now what kinda question is this.

^ hahahaha

Think before you say something stupid? Do I need to re-quote? I think I do.

If only he followed his own advice

lol how mean

mod gang rape :P

If only the mods followed the rules they enforced. :rolleyes:

Hahaha, i just might agree with him :)

No offense mods

I'm not the one with nearly 900 posts in just over a month.

Should I go through all of your and Crowquill's posts to find all the time's you've broken the rules? I could find quite a few pretty recently.

not to mention thats his 2nd account...

didnt think we knew didja >: [

Really? I'd like to see them and if they're just posts of us telling you off that's not breaking the rules just so you know.

While your at it ,why not dig out the times i've let people get away with the same too.

People get passionate about things , I only step in when things get out of hand , do you see me handing out bannings everytime someone bypasses the swear filter , after all thats against the rules.

And the forum is the worse for it. And there are plenty of times I've seen you warn people for thing's you do yourself. And Crowquill is constantly flaming.

I'd like to see examples of my flaming. I admit I can get pissy and I tend to swear alot when I argue (well I swear alot in general) but I can only think of a few times i've stepped over my boundaries.

Well i could start by clearing up the spamming if you think i'm being too lenient.
However that would involve banning you seeing how many times you've been warned about it in the past.

If sex was like metal it would be S&M all the way, and with no chicks.

Err, yeah, my bad about you constantly flaming I was venting my anger at someone you apparently choose not to punish.
@Urban: I'm not seeing the whole spam thing. Seriously, if that's what you consider spam then ban everyone who's ever made a post less than a few sentences.

Okay I have no idea what you mean by the first sentence and by spamming he means several of your posts that are simply "lol."

There are a whole lot of lol posts...I was referring to Wayfarer in the first sentence. He has several posts devoted exlusively to bashing me.