|
Register | Blogging | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#19 (permalink) |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
![]()
Alright, it seems people are not interested in doing this challenge, so I'm gonna take it down. I don't think I have enough results to bother with any kind of sophisticated statistics, but I'll post them here in case someone's curious.
The test was listening to a four different versions of a 30 seconds mp3 encoded in different bitrates. You were asked to arrange sample 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the order lowest bitrate to highest. The correct sequence was : 2, 1, 4, 3 The bitrates (kbps) were : 128, 160, 256, 320. Those who took the test were assigned numbers. You can see how they did here :
The average guessed sequence (counting which BR is found most often in each place) would be : 128, 320, 160, 256 Although there's not much data to base evidence on, from what I can see, people don't seem very good at separating bitrates higher than 160 and not really reliably down to 128 either. It's the result I would expect to find even with more data, so I'm not surprised. Maybe it'll make some people reconsider the worth of very high BR/lossless files even if there's nowhere as much data as I'd like.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|