BR Challenge Round 1 : Can You Identify the Lowest to Highest Bitrates? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Games, Lists, Jokes and Polls
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-21-2010, 10:04 AM   #19 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

Alright, it seems people are not interested in doing this challenge, so I'm gonna take it down. I don't think I have enough results to bother with any kind of sophisticated statistics, but I'll post them here in case someone's curious.

The test was listening to a four different versions of a 30 seconds mp3 encoded in different bitrates. You were asked to arrange sample 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the order lowest bitrate to highest.

The correct sequence was : 2, 1, 4, 3

The bitrates (kbps) were : 128, 160, 256, 320. Those who took the test were assigned numbers. You can see how they did here :
  1. 2, 3, 1, 4 = 1 Rights
  2. 1, 3, 2, 4 = 0 Rights
  3. 4, 1, 2, 3 = 2 Rights
  4. 4, 3, 1, 2 = 0 Rights
  5. 2, 3, 1, 4 = 1 Rights
  6. 2, 4, 3, 1 = 1 Rights
  7. 1, 2, 4, 3 = 2 Rights
  8. 2, 1, 3, 4 = 2 Rights
(Note that there are many possible ways of counting rights in this dataset. This just counts how many of the samples are in the right place in the sequence.)


The average guessed sequence (counting which BR is found most often in each place) would be : 128, 320, 160, 256

Although there's not much data to base evidence on, from what I can see, people don't seem very good at separating bitrates higher than 160 and not really reliably down to 128 either.

It's the result I would expect to find even with more data, so I'm not surprised. Maybe it'll make some people reconsider the worth of very high BR/lossless files even if there's nowhere as much data as I'd like.
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.