Do you prefer X or Y?

Burning Down · 03-08-2014, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Smeenus

I promise you it'll happen

Oh man, that novel was the hardest book I've ever read. I found it to be really dry and heavier than Dickens or Tolstoy.

Moss · 03-08-2014, 11:36 PM

I never got past page 2 of that damn book. "In the beginning there was areiojd son of lhdiofme and he beget adlkjf". Ridiculous.

Trollheart · 03-09-2014, 02:28 PM

Yeah, it's pretty much The Bible for Tolkien fans and very very hard going. I think I got halfway through it, though I was a lot younger in those days...

Isbjørn · 03-09-2014, 03:12 PM

I think it began with some sort of elf whose mind or soul shat out some more elves who all became godly. This was all in the beginning, before anyone had heard about the world and stuff. I haven't read it, but I recently read The Hobbit and I'm halfway through The Fellowship of the Ring. The latter is pretty heavy, even when I'm reading it in damn Norwegian.

Trollheart · 03-09-2014, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Briks

I think it began with some sort of elf whose mind or soul shat out some more elves who all became godly. This was all in the beginning, before anyone had heard about the world and stuff. I haven't read it, but I recently read The Hobbit and I'm halfway through The Fellowship of the Ring. The latter is pretty heavy, even when I'm reading it in damn Norwegian.

If you think Fellowship is heavy you have no chance with Silmarillion. Basically I see it like this: Hobbit = kids and young adults, very entertaining, can be read easily and even as a standalone if you want. LOTR = older adults, requires a lot of work and attention, three books lead into each other. Silmarillion = college professors and people with lots of time. Very dry, very musty, not much in the way of story and more history than anything else. Very heavy on the names, battles, and so on.

cowgal · 03-09-2014, 09:59 PM

I have more memories in winter time

The Batlord · 03-10-2014, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burning Down

Oh man, that novel was the hardest book I've ever read. I found it to be really dry and heavier than Dickens or Tolstoy.

Seriously? It was easy for me. It might even be my favorite. All the different stories are amazing. Turin, Luthien, Feanor, etc. Brilliant. Of course I also love history and would even read my history text books front to back in school long before I had to, so dry is all relative I guess.

Burning Down · 03-10-2014, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

Seriously? It was easy for me. It might even be my favorite. All the different stories are amazing. Turin, Luthien, Feanor, etc. Brilliant. Of course I also love history and would even read my history text books front to back in school long before I had to, so dry is all relative I guess.

I'm serious, and I can easily read a history textbook cover to cover.

Taxman · 03-10-2014, 11:41 AM

I was ten when I read LOTR first time, and I've read it twice after that, in Finnish though. I read The Hobbit in English, and I'm planning that maybe I'll do the same with LOTR but I'm not sure if I'm too assured about my English. And anyway I have read it three times so maybe it's enough and I have no time for reading anyway nowadays.

Isbjørn · 03-10-2014, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart

If you think Fellowship is heavy you have no chance with Silmarillion. Basically I see it like this: Hobbit = kids and young adults, very entertaining, can be read easily and even as a standalone if you want. LOTR = older adults, requires a lot of work and attention, three books lead into each other. Silmarillion = college professors and people with lots of time. Very dry, very musty, not much in the way of story and more history than anything else. Very heavy on the names, battles, and so on.

Heh, The Hobbit took me a couple of months. I have a short attention span.

03-09-2014, 02:28 PM	#53 (permalink)
Trollheart Born to be mild Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: 404 Not Found Posts: 26,971	Yeah, it's pretty much The Bible for Tolkien fans and very very hard going. I think I got halfway through it, though I was a lot younger in those days... __________________ Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018

03-09-2014, 03:12 PM	#54 (permalink)
Isbjørn cooler commie than elph Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: In a hole, help Posts: 2,811	I think it began with some sort of elf whose mind or soul shat out some more elves who all became godly. This was all in the beginning, before anyone had heard about the world and stuff. I haven't read it, but I recently read The Hobbit and I'm halfway through The Fellowship of the Ring. The latter is pretty heavy, even when I'm reading it in damn Norwegian. __________________ fast(ml) Hear me play the guitar Look, mom! I got a journal

03-10-2014, 11:41 AM	#59 (permalink)
Taxman watching the wheels Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Finland Posts: 470	I was ten when I read LOTR first time, and I've read it twice after that, in Finnish though. I read The Hobbit in English, and I'm planning that maybe I'll do the same with LOTR but I'm not sure if I'm too assured about my English. And anyway I have read it three times so maybe it's enough and I have no time for reading anyway nowadays. __________________ ...

03-08-2014, 11:36 PM	#52 (permalink)
Moss Scuttle Buttin' Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Boulder Colorado Posts: 972	I never got past page 2 of that damn book. "In the beginning there was areiojd son of lhdiofme and he beget adlkjf". Ridiculous.

03-09-2014, 09:59 PM	#56 (permalink)
cowgal Groupie Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 0	I have more memories in winter time