WANTED: For crimes against music (lyrics, drum, single, beatles) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-04-2008, 03:21 PM   #91 (permalink)
Back to mono
 
WaspStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_sam View Post
They were a huge influence upon the burgeoning folk genre. Woody Guthrie, Pete Seeger, and Bob Dylan each had their own unique sound, but it was really Simon and Garfunkel that brought folk to the masses. And if you want to discredit them for choosing to entice fans with their incredible harmonies, that's your problem. But you can't expect others to share your misguided views.

Oh, and Jimi Hendrix's All Along The Watchtower is living proof that a cover can be better than the original. Don't feed me shit about it being a travesty. It's complete bullshit to dishonor a song because of some negative stigma you have about covers.
Nowhere did I say that SG were not influential or popular. I simply stated that I don't like them. Peter, Paul, and Mary were quite influential and popular, but they're not very good.

I have no "negative stigma about covers." There are plenty of artists who improved on another person's original song, and I never stated otherwise. In the case of Watchtower, though, I don't think anyone (Dylan himself included) ever topped the version on John Wesley Harding.
WaspStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2008, 03:41 PM   #92 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

I think you owe us an explanation of why they're whole career is a crime against music.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2008, 04:23 PM   #93 (permalink)
Atchin' Akai
 
right-track's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Unamerica
Posts: 8,723
Default

How can you ask for an explanation just because he has a different opinion to you?
right-track is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2008, 10:51 PM   #94 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

Uh, why not? He trashed one of my favorite bands, saying their whole career was a crime against music.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 01:29 AM   #95 (permalink)
Atchin' Akai
 
right-track's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Unamerica
Posts: 8,723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProggyMan View Post
Uh, why not? He trashed one of my favorite bands, saying their whole career was a crime against music.
Errr...that's the point of the thread. Name:  blink.gif
Views: 163
Size:  1.4 KB
I happen to think Paul Simon is one of the greatest songwriters of all time, but if someone slags him off in a thread like this I'm not going to get too bothered.
right-track is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 10:55 AM   #96 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

I'm not 'bothered' I'm just curious why he thinks that and want a reason. Doesn't look like that's happening anytime though.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 03:28 PM   #97 (permalink)
Back to mono
 
WaspStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProggyMan View Post
I think you owe us an explanation of why they're whole career is a crime against music.
1. To take a quote from High Fidelity, I think their music is "sentimental, tacky crap." I really can't say anything else, since that's a value judgment.

2. All the bad music they influenced. Now, granted, there are plenty of acts that spawn bad music (all the Buddy Holly/Dylan/Pistols/Nirvana ripoffs out there), but I think the "singer songwriter" movement that Simon did a great part to inspire was a serious impediment to rock's development. In the early 70's, instead of the Who and the Kinks, we got James Taylor, Carly Simon, Jackson Browne, and Paul Simon. Yes, Simon and Garfunkel were influential...but in my view, their influence was a bad influence (ask me about Sgt. Pepper someday. )

3. To steal another quote (I can't remember where I read it); Simon invented "elitist songwriting." Lines like "hear my words that I might teach you" and the whole of The Dangling Conversation give the lie to anyone who thinks that Jim Morrison is the worst wanna-be poet in rock's canon.

4. The Graduate. Actually, that's a crime against film, but I think there's some overlap.
WaspStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 04:09 PM   #98 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

Quote:
1. To take a quote from High Fidelity, I think their music is "sentimental, tacky crap." I really can't say anything else, since that's a value judgment.
How is sentimentality a negative trait? Tacky:
1. not tasteful or fashionable; dowdy.
2. shabby in appearance; shoddy: a tacky, jerry-built housing development.
3. crass; cheaply vulgar; tasteless; crude.
4. gaudy; flashy; showy.
I think S&G is plenty tasteful, with beautiful melodies and great lyrics. There's great craftmanship, certainly not shabby. Crass? Showy? Songs like The Boxer, The Only Boy Living In New York certainly aren't.

Quote:
2. All the bad music they influenced. Now, granted, there are plenty of acts that spawn bad music (all the Buddy Holly/Dylan/Pistols/Nirvana ripoffs out there), but I think the "singer songwriter" movement that Simon did a great part to inspire was a serious impediment to rock's development. In the early 70's, instead of the Who and the Kinks, we got James Taylor, Carly Simon, Jackson Browne, and Paul Simon. Yes, Simon and Garfunkel were influential...but in my view, their influence was a bad influence (ask me about Sgt. Pepper someday. )
Every act has influenced bad music, from The Beatles to MBV. This isn't about their music.

Quote:
3. To steal another quote (I can't remember where I read it); Simon invented "elitist songwriting." Lines like "hear my words that I might teach you" and the whole of The Dangling Conversation give the lie to anyone who thinks that Jim Morrison is the worst wanna-be poet in rock's canon.
One line from their second single? Sorry, not going to cut it. Most of their lyrics are very down to earth and oftentimes humorous. Wanna be poet? Seems like Simon's the real deal to me.
Its a still life water color,
Of a now late afternoon,
As the sun shines through the curtained lace
And shadows wash the room.
And we sit and drink our coffee
Couched in our indifference,
Like shells upon the shore
You can hear the ocean roar
In the dangling conversation
And the superficial sighs,
Are the borders of our lives.

And you read your emily ****inson,
And I my robert frost,
And we note our place with bookmarkers
That measure what we've lost.
Like a poem poorly written
We are verses out of rhythm,
Couplets out of rhyme,
In syncopated time
Lost in the dangling conversation
And the superficial sighs,
Are the borders of our lives.

Yes, we speak of things that matter,
With words that must be said,
Can analysis be worthwhile?
Is the theater really dead?
And how the room is softly faded
And I only kiss your shadow,
I cannot feel your hand,
Youre a stranger now unto me
Lost in the dangling conversation.
And the superficial sighs,
In the borders of our lives.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 05:53 AM   #99 (permalink)
Back to mono
 
WaspStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProggyMan View Post
How is sentimentality a negative trait? Tacky:
1. not tasteful or fashionable; dowdy.
2. shabby in appearance; shoddy: a tacky, jerry-built housing development.
3. crass; cheaply vulgar; tasteless; crude.
4. gaudy; flashy; showy.
I think S&G is plenty tasteful, with beautiful melodies and great lyrics. There's great craftmanship, certainly not shabby. Crass? Showy? Songs like The Boxer, The Only Boy Living In New York certainly aren't.


Every act has influenced bad music, from The Beatles to MBV. This isn't about their music.


One line from their second single? Sorry, not going to cut it. Most of their lyrics are very down to earth and oftentimes humorous. Wanna be poet?

.
To me, sentimentality is, with very rare exceptions, a killer for songs. I can't stand the cheese in Paul Simon songs. I would definitely say that The Boxer is showy, with all of the novelty instruments and techniques (particularly the elevator-shaft drum echo). Compare the BOTW version to Dylan's version; ok, so the "duet" might suck, but the arrangement is less melodramatic, less flashy. I don't find Simon's melodies particularly beautiful or his lyrics particularly moving or well constructed, but to each his own.

Yes, every act has influenced bad music (a fact I admitted), but I think that when a group's influence has such a wide-ranging negative effect, it can be considered a "crime against music". (You're taking this far too seriously, I imagine. If someone said that the Sex Pistols committed a crime against music by making tunelessness a virtue, I'd laugh it off and figure that it's only their opinion).

I happen to think that The Dangling Conversation is one of the absolute worst lyrics ever written. Their other songs aren't far behind (and I only cited one line because it was the one that first came to mind; I could post every lyric Simon's written if you like). Again, it's a value judgment. To some people, Jim Morrison is a brilliant poet. To others, he's a hack. Neither position is right or wrong.
WaspStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 09:44 AM   #100 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

Well alright, seems like there's not much to argue. agree to disagree I suppose.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.