Is Classical Music considered to be inherently superior to all else? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-16-2009, 08:16 PM   #1 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
music_phantom13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 942
Default

But in the professional world (fields that study music like ethnomusicology) classical music is often considered the only form of music, with a lot of people in the academic refusing to acknowledge even jazz as intelligent music. So by their viewpoint, no there is not. This is ironic to me, because I would expect those people to be open minded.
music_phantom13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 08:24 PM   #2 (permalink)
Partying on the inside
 
Freebase Dali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by music_phantom13 View Post
But in the professional world (fields that study music like ethnomusicology) classical music is often considered the only form of music, with a lot of people in the academic refusing to acknowledge even jazz as intelligent music. So by their viewpoint, no there is not. This is ironic to me, because I would expect those people to be open minded.
Interesting.
I haven't studied that, but in that context it begs the question... was there a such thing as music prior to pianos, trumpets, violins, etc.?
Obviously, the answer is yes.
Classical music can't define itself as the only form of music by virtue of itself if "itself" is composed of instruments inspired by, and created for, the creation of music, unless it's referring to the creation of a form of music related to its creation.
Musical expression happened long before classical music came to be.
__________________
Freebase Dali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 06:55 AM   #3 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
music_phantom13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freebase Dali View Post
Interesting.
I haven't studied that, but in that context it begs the question... was there a such thing as music prior to pianos, trumpets, violins, etc.?
Obviously, the answer is yes.
Classical music can't define itself as the only form of music by virtue of itself if "itself" is composed of instruments inspired by, and created for, the creation of music, unless it's referring to the creation of a form of music related to its creation.
Musical expression happened long before classical music came to be.
Your absolutely right, and earlier music might be studied in academic fields; I'm no expert. I just know that virtually all forms of music that have cropped up in the past 100 years or so that don't fall under the classical umbrella tend to be regarded as crap (except maybe more traditional folk music from around the world, aka not jazz, rap, rock, electronica, etc). Obviously I don't agree with this statement, but it's what I learned when I looked into ethnomusicology.
music_phantom13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.