Quote:
|
AC/DC .. They shouldn't be allowed to wear these mini-shorts, being +55!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Paramore.
1 album was too many |
Oasis would never have released Don't Belive the Truth if they'd stopped after two albums, which I think's a fantastic album, so I can't say I agree with that one. Road To Rouen is one of my favourite albums, so I disagree about Supergrass too.
U2 I can vouch for though. The Stones should've called it a day after they released Tattoo You as well. Another one that springs to mind are the Flying Burrito Brothers, and their thinking they could keep going without Gram Parsons or Chris Hillman. |
Quote:
their first 3 albums (up to the first split) got progressively better. unlike most 90s bands their debut was their weakest point. splitting up obliterated what they had going and they've never been the same since. the next 2 albums following the first reunion were crap. no.4 was a rehash of 'core' which was quite possibly the most generic 'grunge' record of the early 90s, and shangri-la-di-da was just awful. a 60s style album might be decent, but if their history is any indication it's going to sound like a total rehash of Tiny Music (songs for the Vatican gift shop). |
Quote:
U2 should have called it quits after Atchung Baby. 'Tallica after the black album. I suppose The Cure, but not too bothered about whether they still make records, they aren't very good but hey. |
Hmm, lets see...
The Jesus and Mary Chain should have quit after Darklands. The Cure should have quite after Pornography (I never cared for their poppier incarnation) Led Zeppelin should have quite after Physical Graffiti The Who should have quit after Who's Next The Kinks should have quit after Muswell Hillbillies The Strokes should have quit after Is This It Oasis should have quit after (What's the Story) Morning Glory The Clash should have quit after Combat Rock That was all I could think of ATM. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:19 AM. |
© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.