Crimes Against Music - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-23-2011, 03:48 PM   #1 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
Default

Read back through the thread. Many of the YouTube videos have been removed by the major corporations that own the record labels the music was released on.

Now that's a crime against music.
someonecompletelyrandom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 03:49 PM   #2 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
Default

Which I have always found ironic because music videos are basically advertising tools to sell product.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 03:56 PM   #3 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
Which I have always found ironic because music videos are basically advertising tools to sell product.
Exactly. One has to question whether the perceived loss of revenue from unauthorized reposting of videos isn't in reality a gain in the long run.
someonecompletelyrandom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 03:58 PM   #4 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
Default

All I know is if I was in a band and my record company put up a video on youtube and a few days later I logged on there & saw another 10 or 15 unauthorised videos up there too I'd be happy about it, not getting into a rage & demanding they be taken down.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 04:15 PM   #5 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
All I know is if I was in a band and my record company put up a video on youtube and a few days later I logged on there & saw another 10 or 15 unauthorised videos up there too I'd be happy about it, not getting into a rage & demanding they be taken down.
I'd feel the same way. Exposure is exposure. What irks me more, though, is when bands from the 60s and 70s, some of whom haven't even released their music to mp3 format, are blacklisted from being uploaded to YouTube. As if removing their music from a video website is going to increase their CD sales? Give me a break. If anything at all they should help.
someonecompletelyrandom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 04:04 PM   #6 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cebu, Philippines
Posts: 677
Default

i don't regard anything that's meant for publicity as a crime.
The Virgin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 04:37 PM   #7 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 937
Default

It's all about control. It's the same reason they try and stop people watching in some countries even though we live in a global world on the internet. They find it hard to move with the times and realise that actually they can't completely control things.
__________________
non-cliquey member of every music forum I participate on
starrynight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 07:13 PM   #8 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tore View Post
Pan Flute Cover Albums

I'll start off with pan flute covers. I recently found one of these CDs in my parents-in-law's car. They denied ownership of course. So what's the background here? It seems like some record labels, possibly exploiting poor pan-flute playing peoples living in the Andes, pump out these crappy cover albums. They're typically marketed as being particularly soothing for the soul, a stark contrast to the grating effect it has on mine. Judging by the insane amount there are of these albums, producing them must be cheap and artists are possibly payed for with marbles and mirrors. For reasons I can't fully understand, there seems to be a (large) market for these albums. In this country, much of that market seems to come from out of the way gas stations or possibly in stores selling incense and dream catchers to the gullible. I figure the target group are people with no taste who are simply immune to embarassment.

A typical song one might find on such a cover CD is Celine Dion's My Heart Will Go On, although any 60s/70s/80s/90s hit could be covered (although usually http://www.musicbanter.com/newreply....treply&t=53273
Music Banter - Reply to Topicnot later than that since pan flute artists generally lag behind the mainstream in music), particularly the soppy ballads.

To the people who buy this sort of stuff, if you wanna listen to My Heart Will Go On .. Why don't you go get a Celine Dion album?
You are assuming they don't already have a Celine Dion album. Maybe they do, but then again maybe they don't and yet they are still familiar with it, maybe from the radio.

If someone likes Celine Dion on pan flutes I feel you (you - plural) can't judge that person, you can't demand they know what you know, like what you like. An analogy would be if a person graduates with a Master in Lit they shouldn't be going around teasing kinder gardeners how they read - it seems pretentious.

I see it as an amalgamation of different separate tastes, one is Celine Dion and the other is the sound of the pan instrument. Maybe the Pan Flute/Celine Dion as a poor example for this - they are better examples. I'm all for a listener to broaden their musical horizons, for that person experiencing an alternative version of a song they like, maybe they would hear something different they like and think maybe there is more to life than corporate music world that encapsulate Celine Dion. Musical taste is just like anything else, the music that's out there is like anything else there are Peugeots and and then there are Aston Martins - to each his or her own. You can't expect every automobile manufacturer to build only one type of car. It's good to test ride something else before you buy a car to weigh the pro's and con's.

I'm not anti-Pop per se but it is the over commercialize acts that the real crime against music as an art form. Music began it's suffering of not being an art form when it became a commercialize product. When it went from a social event of a band with a live audience that interacted with each other to a recording of a band which one often listens to by oneself, which if one looks at it objectively seem like a lonely event - music should be shared.

I don't think the crime against music is some guy playing cover songs with a pan flute, maybe this is a way of him paying his dues maybe his dream won't pan out because the market is supersaturated with cover-song-pan flutist (most points you brought up are legitimate and very rarely if any will be a recognizable household, they get paid peanuts) and of course it has to be put into perspective, it's not the height of music as art, nor a true form of traditional music.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 07:37 PM   #9 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Captain Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: in a boat with your girlfriend
Posts: 274
Default

the biggest crime is that looks are more important than musical ability nowdays
Captain Ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 02:00 AM   #10 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
nbakid2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 179
Default

The biggest crime against music is the Loudness War which destroys the dynamics and sound of music.

nbakid2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.