Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Itunesucks
Oh no no, you like Forever? It's barely listenable. 36 Chambers is raw,everyone shines, production is near perfect, hooks are memorable, more memorable one liners, more impactful, no lame ass music videos (Just saying Triumph is pretty gangsta).
Not arguing, just giving you my point of view for 36 Chambers.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forever-a-Cone
Forever is good, I just don't think I would have been able to get it unless I had listened to 36 Chambers first. I have to agree that 36 is just in general more memorable than anything on Forever. Then again, it might just be nostalgia.
|
I think it has a lot to do with the fact that everyone and their mother hypes
36 Chambers to no end. In my eyes their debut was a show of what they would come to be, both lyrically and production wise while
Forever was their opus, and feels more cohesive and ill. I can recite 3/4 of
Forever word for word and enjoy it loads more than
36 Chambers, which is not to say that I don't love the debut but I've never understood the hype aside from the obvious nostalgia/influence argument. And anyone who thinks that the rhymes on
36 Chambers are objectively better than
Forever needs to get their head checked
Threaded Mode