Rolling Stone: 10 Greatest Albums of All Time

**Janszoon** · 08-06-2012, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackdragon123

My reference to the "majority" was actually directed at Duraddict's mathematical misunderstanding

That's why the quote button is your friend.

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackdragon123

Well if no one cares about my opinion in the thread then why are posts being made that accuse the threadmaker of trying to make mb a "beatle fan site?"

Are they? If so they're wrong.

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackdragon123

and yes it was a worthwhile sentence. Because the childish resentment towards a pop group completely overshadows the fact that 60% of the entries on the list are not by that band..........

Don't you agree that's it's a little crazy to give almost half the "best album of all time" slots to one band though? As I indicated in the second post in this thread, that's just one of many issues with RS's list though. The fact that, according to them, every "best album of all time" was released within the span of two decades, by only the US and UK, almost exclusively within the rock genre is the really absurd part.

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackdragon123

Viewed in the context of the compiled "500" list. The Rolling Stones and Bob Dylan both have the same amount of entries as The Beatles, yet they are not repayed with the same scorn...odd

It's not really that odd since people are reacting to the top 10, not the top 500.

blackdragon123 · 08-06-2012, 10:29 AM

But i included the list of the bands with the most entries in my original post...It wasn't put there to be ignored. The context of the list is just as important......and the context states that The Beatles, the Stones and Dylan are hogging up the most entries. If the issue is that The Beatles are so over exposed and "run into the ground" by fans why isn't Mick Jagger targeted? The man is a self confessed sell out and the sheer amount of recycled crappy compilations that the Stones release every year makes them far more over exposed. their logo has become a cheap image to tack onto t-shirts but apparently the Beatles are the ones we should all be angry at?

The Batlord · 08-06-2012, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackdragon123

But i included the list of the bands with the most entries in my original post...It wasn't put there to be ignored.

Do I look like your slave? I'm not obligated to click on every link you post just because you post it. I read your post, then I moved on. Quit being a whiny, internet pissant. Jesus Christ.

**Janszoon** · 08-06-2012, 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackdragon123

But i included the list of the bands with the most entries in my original post...It wasn't put there to be ignored.

I'm not sure if I understand what you're saying here. There's no list in your original post.

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackdragon123

The context of the list is just as important......and the context states that The Beatles, the Stones and Dylan are hogging up the most entries. If the issue is that The Beatles are so over exposed and "run into the ground" by fans why isn't Mick Jagger targeted? The man is a self confessed sell out and the sheer amount of recycled crappy compilations that the Stones release every year makes them far more over exposed. their logo has become a cheap image to tack onto t-shirts but apparently the Beatles are the ones we should all be angry at?

If you take a look at my last reply to you (or at the first post I made in this thread), you'll see that my gripe is with the list as a whole, not just the Beatles.

moserw · 08-06-2012, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jackhammer

Nirvana - Nevermind
Massive Attack - Mezzanine
DJ Shadow - Endtroducing
Swans - Cop
Fugazi - Thirteen Songs

just a couple for you that influenced their respective genres and less of the 'Boi' thank you I'm not 12.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofle11

You need to check the other three out.

DJ Shadow - Endtroducing... its different and I like it but TBH I'm not exactly digging it... I'm more into electronica from Thievery Corporation, Prodigy, etc.

Fugazi - Thirteen Songs - I'm digging them!

Swans - Cop - A bit too explicit to my liking (from Amazon) so I've not gotten around to them yet.

blackdragon123 · 08-06-2012, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

Do I look like your slave? I'm not obligated to click on every link you post just because you post it. I read your post, then I moved on. Quit being a whiny, internet pissant. Jesus Christ.

i didnt post any links......awkward.....

Paedantic Basterd · 08-06-2012, 10:36 AM

The context of the list is Rolling Stone. The context of this forum is much broader. I don't think most of us are surprised, offended, or otherwise moved at all by a mainstream publication's top ten.

blackdragon123 · 08-06-2012, 10:37 AM

judging by the crybaby remarks made about the thread i would beg to differ

The Batlord · 08-06-2012, 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackdragon123

i didnt post any links......awkward.....

I know, I just checked. How on earth would I know about a bigger list if you never even mentioned it?

blackdragon123 · 08-06-2012, 10:39 AM

I didn't say i included the list...i said i included a list of the bands that had the most entries on the "500" list.....do you feel silly? cause you should

View Poll Results: top 10 albums of all time?
Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band	12	17.65%
Pet Sounds	5	7.35%
Revolver	5	7.35%
Highway 61 Revisited	7	10.29%
Rubber Soul	2	2.94%
What's Going On?	4	5.88%
Exile on Main St.	4	5.88%
London Calling	10	14.71%
Blonde on Blonde	4	5.88%
The Beatles (The White Album)	7	10.29%
I hate all of them!	8	11.76%
Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll

08-06-2012, 10:29 AM	#72 (permalink)
blackdragon123 don't be no bojangles Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Wales Posts: 496	But i included the list of the bands with the most entries in my original post...It wasn't put there to be ignored. The context of the list is just as important......and the context states that The Beatles, the Stones and Dylan are hogging up the most entries. If the issue is that The Beatles are so over exposed and "run into the ground" by fans why isn't Mick Jagger targeted? The man is a self confessed sell out and the sheer amount of recycled crappy compilations that the Stones release every year makes them far more over exposed. their logo has become a cheap image to tack onto t-shirts but apparently the Beatles are the ones we should all be angry at? __________________ 'Well, I'm a common working man, With a half of bitter, bread and jam, And if it pleases me, I'll put one on ya man, When the copper fades away!' - Jethro Tull

08-06-2012, 10:37 AM	#78 (permalink)
blackdragon123 don't be no bojangles Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Wales Posts: 496	judging by the crybaby remarks made about the thread i would beg to differ __________________ 'Well, I'm a common working man, With a half of bitter, bread and jam, And if it pleases me, I'll put one on ya man, When the copper fades away!' - Jethro Tull

08-06-2012, 10:39 AM	#80 (permalink)
blackdragon123 don't be no bojangles Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Wales Posts: 496	I didn't say i included the list...i said i included a list of the bands that had the most entries on the "500" list.....do you feel silly? cause you should __________________ 'Well, I'm a common working man, With a half of bitter, bread and jam, And if it pleases me, I'll put one on ya man, When the copper fades away!' - Jethro Tull

08-06-2012, 10:36 AM	#77 (permalink)
Paedantic Basterd Music Addict Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 5,184	The context of the list is Rolling Stone. The context of this forum is much broader. I don't think most of us are surprised, offended, or otherwise moved at all by a mainstream publication's top ten.