Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   General Music (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/)
-   -   VMAs 2013 (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/71515-vmas-2013-a.html)

Soulflower 08-29-2013 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. (Post 1362898)
Actually she mentioned that MJ had better tone and range then Timberlake, which I disagreed with. That is a discussion based on technical ability, unless range and tone have nothing to do with technical ability. We discussed other stuff in general about them and it remained civil. I never stifled anyones opinions either that is nonsense.


I am going to respond to your past post but I want to quickly respond to this. By the way, thanks for disagreeing with and making this discussion fun lol Its no hard feelings here. I just simply did not see the relevance in you saying that you were trained in classical vocals.


You are right. I did say that MJ had a broader range than Justin but you said that that you are trained in CLASSICAL vocals.

MJ and Justin are not classical singers.

Dr_Rez 08-29-2013 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by realtalk92 (Post 1362899)
I am going to respond to your past post but I want to quickly respond to this. By the way, thanks for disagreeing with and making this discussion fun lol Its no hard feelings here. I just simply did not see the relevance in you saying that you were trained in classical vocals.


You are right. I did say that MJ had a broader range than Justin but you said that that you are trained in CLASSICAL vocals.

MJ and Justin are not classical singers.

No but knowledge of voice carries over...

FRED HALE SR. 08-29-2013 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rezdaddy Longlegs (Post 1362904)
No but knowledge of voice carries over...

This thread is a broken record. Obviously my understanding of Michael Jackson is skewed due to my lack of pop skilled training. My only reason for mentioning it was to imply that I understand the concept of range/tone and it wasn't lost on me at my first listening of Michael Jackson.

djchameleon 08-29-2013 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. (Post 1362898)
Actually she mentioned that MJ had better tone and range then Timberlake, which I disagreed with. That is a discussion based on technical ability, unless range and tone have nothing to do with technical ability. We discussed other stuff in general about them and it remained civil. I never stifled anyones opinions either that is nonsense.

Okay I might've missed that.

Dr_Rez 08-29-2013 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. (Post 1362908)
This thread is a broken record. Obviously my understanding of Michael Jackson is skewed due to my lack of pop skilled training. My only reason for mentioning it was to imply that I understand the concept of range/tone and it wasn't lost on me at my first listening of Michael Jackson.

Im agreeing with you....

FRED HALE SR. 08-29-2013 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 1362911)
Okay I might've missed that.

Eh no biggie. I hate you all. :rofl: I'm gonna go throw in some Leif Garrett now cause he blows away all of em.

Endureth 08-29-2013 05:28 PM

What's the big deal? The VMAs do something 'controversial' every year. It's a gimmick to get them in the news. I mean, the only reason you guys are talking about it is because you've been sold on the idea that it's controversial by the news. Otherwise, would anyone really care? Doubtful.

I call it shock advertising.

Soulflower 08-29-2013 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. (Post 1362908)
This thread is a broken record. Obviously my understanding of Michael Jackson is skewed due to my lack of pop skilled training. My only reason for mentioning it was to imply that I understand the concept of range/tone and it wasn't lost on me at my first listening of Michael Jackson.

Oh please that isnt the issue

You should have said that because when you say things like this:

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. (Post 1362908)
And being that i'm classically trained in vocals i'd say my ears are good enough to form an opinion on the subject.

It comes off like you feel like your opinion is justified or more superior because you have training.
ANYBODY who listens to music can form an opinion on the subject whether they have training or not

Burning Down 08-30-2013 04:15 AM

FTR, neither of them have good tone or vocal range, compared to other singers I listen to. Doesn't mean I don't enjoy their music though.

DamndatDrop 08-30-2013 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob. (Post 1361621)

Yeah she's a damn <insert swear word here>. Anyway, nice marketing... Everyone is talking about this haha.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:56 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.