Bowie Album Survivor: Final Round - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-18-2016, 04:56 PM   #61 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Black Country
Posts: 8,827
Default

Another vote for 1967. Some rubbish on there in all honesty.
Cuthbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2016, 11:47 PM   #62 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,711
Default

Are you breaking them up into chunks of 4 by chronological order? I think that's a bad way to do it since you have some uber strong stretches from Bowie (see: the 70s) and some uber bad ones (see: 85-95).

Who's gonna want to eliminate Lodger in the first round, and then have to pick one of those turds from the late 80s?
midnight rain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 12:39 AM   #63 (permalink)
.
 
grindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 7,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rain View Post
Are you breaking them up into chunks of 4 by chronological order? I think that's a bad way to do it since you have some uber strong stretches from Bowie (see: the 70s) and some uber bad ones (see: 85-95).

Who's gonna want to eliminate Lodger in the first round, and then have to pick one of those turds from the late 80s?
That's the idea. We tried to have albums of vaguely the same level of quality and more or less similar style in every round if possible. That makes for a much more interesting battle. Of course the late eighties stuff for example will be voted off immediately, once we pit the individual battle's winners against each other, but so what? There will still be enough good albums from his good periods left to make it interesting.
__________________
A smell of petroleum prevails throughout.
grindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 12:46 AM   #64 (permalink)
 
Plainview's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 721
Default

1967 again. It's not even as bad as people make out though really.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadChannel
The overuse of babe/baby, the lack of any sort of discernible originality, the melodrama and the general sense of an especially heinous sort of hardcore vapid stupidity all make me want to jab my eyes out with a drill-press and then hang myself from the CN Tower with an electrified rope that sends shocks in excess of 10,000 volts through my body as I slowly die. While listening to Dream Theater.
Plainview is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 12:50 AM   #65 (permalink)
.
 
grindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 7,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Plainview View Post
1967 again. It's not even as bad as people make out though really.
I listened to it the first time in preparation for this thread and I thought it was pretty annoying.
His voice is already unmistakable and I guess it's quite an achievement for a debut of someone that young, but overall it's rather bad.
__________________
A smell of petroleum prevails throughout.
grindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 02:37 AM   #66 (permalink)
Surfin Sonic Destruction
 
Hypocrisy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: mother gaia
Posts: 220
Default

Don't dig the debut , '67, again.
Hypocrisy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 05:20 AM   #67 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,970
Default

I wasn't half as unimpressed with the debut as I expected to be. As I'm finding with Discographius Trollheartus Enormicus, not too many bands, even really favourite ones of mine, can impress with their first outing. He does. Even so, yeah, of the first four, there's no doubting which goes out of the contest first.

David Bowie (1967)
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 11:01 AM   #68 (permalink)
.
 
grindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 7,201
Default

Perhaps you should change the thread title to reflect that Round I has begun.
It might also be useful to have the full list in the OP, so that people can plan ahead with their votes and as a general overview.
__________________
A smell of petroleum prevails throughout.
grindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 11:07 AM   #69 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grindy View Post
Perhaps you should change the thread title to reflect that Round I has begun.
It might also be useful to have the full list in the OP, so that people can plan ahead with their votes and as a general overview.
Read my usertitle....
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2016, 11:15 AM   #70 (permalink)
.
 
grindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 7,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
Read my usertitle....
As far as I know, the ones who run a survivor thread usually contact a mod to change the title accordingly.
And I'm pretty sure you don't need to be a mod to edit one of your own posts.
__________________
A smell of petroleum prevails throughout.
grindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.