The correct usage would be "you should have".... You said "You should had."

Yeah well, you can't keep having a poll made. He had only one chance to make it, and he had missed the opportunity to make it. I was talking about something he should "had" done when he "had" the chance, so shouldn't be "he should had"? Right? I mean any one else would had or have said "he should of made the poll."

No.

Not to be pedantic, but no, I don't think there's ever a usage of "should had". Would you say "Hitler turned towards Kiev when he should had gone on to Moscow?" No, you'd say "he should have". So no matter the tense of the sentence, I think it's "should have" always.

It's good to work with you for once. Don't get used to it.

I won't.
You ****.
:)

Not so much Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice as, well,
Batman v Dazzler: Dawn of Whatever .... ;)

I don't really own any music, I just stream everything from spotify. I'd prefer to have every album I enjoy on CD, but it's not feasible atm.

Sometimes YouTube, sometimes CD, sometimes TV, sometimes Soundcloud.com, sometimes a movie DVD.

CD. CDs give the truest sound to the recorded song.

Most people put music up at youtube in mid-range mp3, which takes a 40mb file and compresses (of whatever it does) it to 3 or 4mb. Which is also the version many use for MP3 players. These versions are far from true, and in my car a CD played at volume 25 is loud, I have to turn it up to 50 for the same song on my MP3 player.

CD, vinyl or high-end MP3/AIFF are what you should listen to, to hear what the artist recorded at it's finest.

Mp3's Big Boi.