The Album Club: "Famous Places" by Goldmund - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: How much do you like the album? (Voting without a writeup is UNACCEPTABLE)
Loved it 2 20.00%
Liked it 2 20.00%
Meh 4 40.00%
Disliked it 1 10.00%
Hated it 1 10.00%
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2017, 10:04 AM   #1 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,970
Default The Album Club: "Famous Places" by Goldmund

Please post all reviews of the second album chosen by OccultHawk, to begin reviewing Monday July 24, here. Thanks. Any further discussion on/abuse of Casanova should be placed in its own sub-thread, not here.
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2017, 05:54 AM   #2 (permalink)
Aficionado of Fine Filth
 
Psy-Fi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: You don't want to look in there.
Posts: 6,798
Default

Goldmund - Famous Places

This one hit me like an audio sedative. I kept imagining this being the film score to a boring PBS documentary, with a camera slowly panning across and slowly zooming in and out of old B&W photos while this was playing.
Not bad, but... zzzz.

5/10
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwb View Post
A middle class job sounds like a boring menu option at a brothel

She's a Brick House
Psy-Fi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2017, 06:24 AM   #3 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,636
Default

Goldmund - Famous Places


Right away, this album made me think of the album 'Postcards From' by Fiona Brice. A bit later, I realized that they have very much the same concept going on: Minimalist piano arrangements; each named after a place in the world (Although only the Brice album sticks to the idea 100% of the way).

I can probably best describe my feelings about this Goldmund album by comparing it with the Fiona Brice album.

Where Brice's album spans an interesting range of expressions, this Goldmund album quickly starts feeling like it all blends together in my mind. The former is also much more emotionally poignant to me, whereas the latter feels more like some kind of TV commercial half the time. These melodies are simply too banal and obvious and there's just no hint of any sort of nuanced approach to harmonic construction. I don't know much about musical theory, but I can still hear that the Goldmund album has a very limited approach to key signatures and chords. It just all feels so obvious and so lacking in matured songwriting sensibilities. This artist knows of only one mood: Twinkly prettiness. The Brice album actually very sucessfully instills each piece with a unique character of it's own, giving the sense that each piece was written at a different place in the world, with a different mindset and I believe she actually did travel to all of those places. The Goldmund album seems to suggest that all places in the world feel the same to him/her.
Based on my impression of this album, Goldmund feels like a very young artist who is still new at this sort of thing. Brice, comparatively, feels like a seasoned pro with a strong command of composition and harmonic structure.

The sound quality and musicianship on the Goldmund album is, as such, flawless. It isn't bad music by any means, but I can't imagine ever wanting to go back to this either. It severaly lacks personality and memorable musical ideas. There's a very strong sense of banality to the album, which makes the PBS documentery muzak comparison of the above poster depressingly accurate.

Listened to: 1 time, plus a few returns to earlier tracks for a reminder/double check.

Rating: 4/10, which on my scale, isn't so bad. It's just profoundly unremarkable, but didn't actively turn me off.
I would have rated it lower were it not for a few brief moments where everything came together a bit better. Mostly, it's pretty bland, so that kind of kills it for me.

---

I would love to like something for a change. Otherwise, The Album Club should be renamed The Torture Dungeon.
Oh well... there's always next week...

Last edited by MicShazam; 07-28-2017 at 03:55 PM.
MicShazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2017, 09:50 AM   #4 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MicShazam View Post
Otherwise, The Album Club should be renamed The Torture Dungeon.
Oh well... there's always next week...
We already had that

http://www.musicbanter.com/general-m...orture+chamber

__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2017, 10:40 AM   #5 (permalink)
Jacob Sartorius
 
Blank.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Dank memes
Posts: 4,034
Default



Well, if you're a fan of ambient piano music this is for you. It's forty five minutes piano music... This is a good album but it suffers from a lack of variety. Each song is good in its own right, but doesn't really stand out. They all just meld together and feel like a long piano piece.

I'm bored by this... great sleeping music though.

☆☆1/2
Blank. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2017, 10:44 AM   #6 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,970
Default

Oh, I should also point out: now that we have separate threads for each album there's no need to quote it in your review if you don't want to. You can if you want, but it's superfluous now.

And on we go...

From the man who brought you Old Lady Drivers? I must admit, I was quite taken aback, given that I had (probably mistakenly) expected all Occult's picks to be harsh, abrasive, noisy things. I can, after reading some of the reviews here, find a lot to agree with. Let's enter the matrix...

1. What were your VERY FIRST impressions on listening to the album, say from the first five minutes in?
Wow! This is really relaxing! Did not expect this.

2. What did you think of the opening track?
Lovely, very soft and acoustic and laidback, very relaxing.

3. What did you think of the next track?
Kind of the same (problem ahead)

4. Did you like the vocalist? Hate him/her? Any impressions? (see note 1)
n/a

5. Did the music (only) generally appeal to you, or not? (see note 2)
Yes, it was all really nice and there was nothing I didn't enjoy

6. Did the album get better or worse as you listened to it (first time)?
Better, with a caveat, that being that although it improved, for me, in that it didn't suddenly become anything unexpected, it also stayed basically the same all the way through, to the point where on my second listen I had wandered five tracks into another album of his before I realised. It's all very similar.

7. What did you think of the lyrical content?
n/a

8. Did you like the instrumental parts? (see note 3)
n/a

9. What did you think of the production?
Insert answer here

10. Did you know of this artiste prior to listening to the album, and if so, did that foreknowledge colour your perception of this album?
No and no

11. Is this, generally, the kind of music you listen to or not?
I certainly would, though I'd prefer there to be a little more variety, perhaps some energy. Much of it could be described, I think, as quite lethargic, even boring? Good music to fall asleep to, certainly.

12. Assuming you listened to the album more than once, on repeated listens, did you find you liked the album more, or less?

Oddly, I kind of liked it less, as I realised that it all sound so much the same.

13. What would you class as your favourite track(s), if you have any?

I couldn't pick out one track; it all kind of blended together for me into one long composition. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but it isn't really a good thing either.

14. And the one(s) you liked least?
n/a

15. If the album in question is a debut, did that fact allow it, in your mind, any leeway, and if so, was that decision justified or vindicated? (see note 4)
n/a

16. Are you now looking forward to hearing more from this artiste, if you have not heard any of their other material?
I thought so, but on listening to the other album (well, part of it) – The Malady of Elegance – I realise that all his music seems to sound basically the same, so I'm not sure it's worth it. Would keep for a night-time/go-to-bed album for sure.

17. Were you surprised by your reaction - positive or negative - to the album?
Yes, initially, but I was more surprised by how bored I quickly became.

18. Did the album end well?
The closer sounded pretty much like every other track, so, well, I don't know. Probably not, on balance, as it was nothing particularly memorable.


19. Do you see any way the album could have been improved?

A bit (a lot) more variety. Something to break up the monotony of the piano – some strings, bit of acoustic guitar, a flute even?

20. Do you think the album hung together well, ie was a fully cohesive unit, or was it a bit hit-and-miss?
Considering the music was supposed to represent places, I didn't get this at all, since every track sounded much alike, and so I think, for me anyway, it failed in its mission. Therefore not as cohesive as it should have been.

Had intended to rate this quite highly, but I feel now all I can manage is a 7/10, based on the fact that the music is lovely, even if it is all pretty much the same.
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2017, 10:51 AM   #7 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,970
Default

Just so you know: I can count, and I see five votes and only four reviews. I'm thinking of making all future polls show the usernames of who voted (Frown, can this one be amended to show that? No? Too late?) so I want to again warn against anyone voting but not bothering to post their review. I know it's early, and there's plenty of time left, but Number Five, (what a pity it wasn't Number Six, eh?) you know who you are: make sure you post as well as vote please.
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2017, 10:52 AM   #8 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
Just so you know: I can count, and I see five votes and only four reviews. I'm thinking of making all future polls show the usernames of who voted (Frown, can this one be amended to show that? No? Too late?) so I want to again warn against anyone voting but not bothering to post their review. I know it's early, and there's plenty of time left, but Number Five, (what a pity it wasn't Number Six, eh?) you know who you are: make sure you post as well as vote please.
Too late.

And is this really a necessary thing to care about? Votes sans reviews won't count for club credit, but they're certainly not hurting anything.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2017, 11:06 AM   #9 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,636
Default

If there ends up being many more votes than reviews, then at least that can be used to show if the average reviewer opinion fits with a slightly
broader consensus or not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
Oh joy, that sounds like a lot of self hating fun. It's been dead since at least February though. February 2016.
MicShazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2017, 11:34 AM   #10 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,033
Default

No secret ballots!
__________________

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion

Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND:

https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html

OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.