Your top 5 worst rocknroll moments

**Exo** · 12-29-2017, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk

You should spend that energy on coming to terms with the truth.

Give me your opinion. I'll throw it on the "I don't give a sh*t" pile with Nea's.

Trollheart · 12-29-2017, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exo

Nea, we are buddies, but motherf*cker I will fight you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exo

Give me your opinion. I'll throw it on the "I don't give a sh*t" pile with Nea's.

grindy · 12-29-2017, 11:55 AM

I like Waits but I see very well where Hawk and Nea are coming from.

The Batlord · 12-29-2017, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor

well they signed to a major label because they were just hungry broke teenagers/20 somethings

then regretted it a lot as they got older

they become increasingly "save the world" actually

so regardless of their status as sellouts you're framing it wrong

**** didn't work out the way they wanted so they got their principles back? Those are some principles. If The Clash gave as much of a **** as they claim then they'd have either been Crass or wouldn't have wasted time in a rock band in the first place. Being in a political band is self-indulgent as ****.

Trollheart · 12-29-2017, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy

I like Waits but I see very well where Hawk and Nea are coming from.

So do I.

grindy · 12-29-2017, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart

So do I.

Those mom jeans look really nice on you.

Trollheart · 12-29-2017, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy

Those mom jeans look really nice on you.

If only I had an ass like that!

~~MicShazam~~ · 12-29-2017, 03:52 PM

I think Tom Waits is both a very transparent phony and a dude with a pretty stong aesthetic instinct. I think some of his material really hits a certain feel pretty spot on. I don't think he would deny that his whole artistic persona is entirely made up. He's theatrical, first and foremost. For me, it's just that his gimmick is as much hit as miss, but I get what he's going for.

**Exo** · 12-29-2017, 04:33 PM

I just don't see how a public persona automatically means phoney. That's like calling Andy Kaufman a phoney. Really? It's an act? No sh*t.

OccultHawk · 12-29-2017, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MicShazam

I think Tom Waits is both a very transparent phony and a dude with a pretty stong aesthetic instinct. I think some of his material really hits a certain feel pretty spot on. I don't think he would deny that his whole artistic persona is entirely made up. He's theatrical, first and foremost. For me, it's just that his gimmick is as much hit as miss, but I get what he's going for.

That reminded me of Jerry Springer’s final thoughts. Well said.

12-29-2017, 11:55 AM	#83 (permalink)
grindy . Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: . Posts: 7,201	I like Waits but I see very well where Hawk and Nea are coming from. __________________ *A smell of petroleum prevails throughout.*

12-29-2017, 04:33 PM	#89 (permalink)
Exo All day jazz and biscuits Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: NJ Posts: 7,359	I just don't see how a public persona automatically means phoney. That's like calling Andy Kaufman a phoney. Really? It's an act? No sht. __________________ LastFM SUPREME POO BAH MODERATOR EXTRAORDINAIRE*

12-29-2017, 03:52 PM	#88 (permalink)
~~MicShazam~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Aalborg Posts: 7,636	I think Tom Waits is both a very transparent phony and a dude with a pretty stong aesthetic instinct. I think some of his material really hits a certain feel pretty spot on. I don't think he would deny that his whole artistic persona is entirely made up. He's theatrical, first and foremost. For me, it's just that his gimmick is as much hit as miss, but I get what he's going for.