Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   General Music (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/)
-   -   Nathanblake719 babbles about bands he doesn't like (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/91759-nathanblake719-babbles-about-bands-he-doesnt-like.html)

Blank. 05-15-2018 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1950996)
lol

I can't

Be wrong? Well you are.

Blank. 05-15-2018 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1951001)
if you google "pop rock" you will find a list of literally every rock band that has ever been popular

because it's a meaningless term

If only we had a term for popular rock artists.

MicShazam 05-15-2018 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1950982)
they only seem this way in retrospect because they were massively influential

the album in question here sold like garbage

Ok, but I still wonder about the Ramones in general? I mean, if we forget for a moment that pop-punk is often used as a derogatory term, couldn't it be said that the Ramones are pop punk? In the sense that several 90's punk acts are considered pop-punk. The element of danger is missing with the Ramones, and they're very polished and hooky. None of those have to be negative traits, but it just strikes me that they have a lot in common with bands that are considered pop punk.

If one wants to make that distinction at all.

MicShazam 05-15-2018 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1950996)
lol

I can't

maybe some people do say this but it's ****ing stupid

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1951001)
if you google "pop rock" you will find a list of
literally every rock band that has ever been popular

because it's a meaningless term

Genre terms aren't perfect. They're just supposed to help with categorization.

Most music stores I've been to that had genre sorting put Lady Gaga, Led Zeppelin, Abba and punk in the same larger category of pop/rock, then usually separate sections for blues, classical, jazz and metal. One big record store chain that doesn't exist anymore also had an indie category.

In academic terms, both Cannibal Corpse and Britney Spears are simply "popular music", with differentiation only applied between blues, jazz, classical and various kinds of traditional and avant garde music (I think they might also consider electronic music and country separate categories).
This makes sense from a certain perspective, since the only differences between death metal and dance pop, for example, are stylistic. There's a reason why it's so easy to convert a pop song into a metal song, a rock song into disco, etc.

It's a pie that you can slice in many different ways, depending on your needs and what distinctions you care to make.

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1951011)
Ramones were dangerous in their time, they debuted out of CBGB, in a NYC that was the Detroit of its time

putting that aside however the music itself is not nearly as polished as 90's pop punk, it's objectively very lofi in its recording comparatively, Sire was a small label at the time, not a lot of money went into making that first album

we're talking about the band that's on a short list for pioneering Punk itself, a definitive punk band, to retrospectively label them "pop punk" is pretty ridiculous


I don't know if I agree, but I don't know enough about their discography to insist. I just think that it's at the very least an interesting idea to consider them a pioneering punk act and a pioneering pop punk act. Really, I think the difference between punk and pop punk is just paper thin, since it's more about how raw their sound is and their status, than it's about the makeup of the music itself.

I might be wrong.

The Sane Psycho 05-15-2018 02:16 AM

1. The Fastbacks are pretty lofi, but they're undeniably pop punk. Same with Green Day before Dookie. Same with Four Minute Mile era Get Up Kids.

2. To answer your question, I don't think there is a such thing as just "pure" punk.

Janszoon 05-15-2018 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1951018)
then what are you distinguishing from with the prefix "pop", something that wasn't used until the 90's describing commercial bands influenced by punk

There are a lot of terms that are applied retroactively to bands. For example, The Stooges are now referred to as protopunk but obviously nobody referred to anything as protopunk until after punk became a well known genre. Likewise, the Ramones may not have been called pop punk back in the 70s, but their sound was heavily influenced by early 60s pop such as The Beach Boys and they were a major influence on pop punk bands that came later. So they're arguably the original pop punk band.

The Sane Psycho 05-15-2018 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1951026)
There are a lot of terms that are applied retroactively to bands. For example, The Stooges are now referred to as protopunk but obviously nobody referred to anything as protopunk until after punk became a well known genre. Likewise, the Ramones may not have been called pop punk back in the 70s, but their sound was heavily influenced by early 60s pop such as The Beach Boys and they were a major influence on pop punk bands that came later. So they're arguably the original pop punk band.

While the Ramones were undoubtedly highly influential on the genre, I would argue that Go Girl Crazy by the Dictators is the original pop punk album.

I'm surprised so many people are agreeing with me. I was certain calling those classic bands pop punk would be a controversial opinion. I was honestly expecting more insults and doubts about my credibility and knowledge thrown my way. Thanks guys!

Trollheart 05-15-2018 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blank. (Post 1950992)
Yeah, he doesn't know punk like us. Check out this punk band, I think you're gonna like it:


Ban this man for posting obscene videos! :yikes: I can feel my lunch coming back up....
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Sane Psycho (Post 1950995)
Please enlighten me, oh pretentious one. I need your annoying punker than thou attitude to guide me out of my foolishness.

Oh this is elph all over.
Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1951005)
they usually just get called Rock, christ

until you had prog and punk, and finally fully electronic pop, pop and rock were just interchangeable

but if we take "pop" to mean popular again, you have the fact that Ramones were about as popular as the other (American) first wave punk bands, that is, not at all

Nah that's Worship Music, mate.
Quote:

Originally Posted by MicShazam (Post 1951012)
Genre terms aren't perfect. They're just supposed to help with categorization.

Most music stores I've been to that had genre sorting put Lady Gaga, Led Zeppelin, Abba and punk in the same larger category of pop/rock, then usually separate sections for blues, classical, jazz and metal. One big record store chain that doesn't exist anymore also had an indie category.

In academic terms, both Cannibal Corpse and Britney Spears are simply "popular music", with differentiation only applied between blues, jazz, classical and various kinds of traditional and avant garde music (I think they might also consider electronic music and country separate categories).
This makes sense from a certain perspective, since the only differences between death metal and dance pop, for example, are stylistic. There's a reason why it's so easy to convert a pop song into a metal song, a rock song into disco, etc.

Oh can you imagine the collab? :laughing:
Quote:

It's a pie that you can slice in many different ways, depending on your needs and what distinctions you care to make.
Again...
Spoiler for NSFW (Not Safe For Wimps):



Quote:


I might be wrong.
Oh if more people here believed this it would be such a better place!
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Sane Psycho (Post 1951016)
1. The Fastbacks are pretty lofi, but they're undeniably pop punk. Same with Green Day before Dookie. Same with Four Minute Mile era Get Up Kids.

2. To answer your question, I don't think there is a such thing as just "pure" punk.

What about Hardcore Punk? Would that not be "pure" punk? Remembering that I know about as much about punk as I do about quantum physics...

OccultHawk 05-15-2018 05:58 AM

I agree with elph in spirit, especially in the sense that it’s absolute blasphemy to associate The Ramones with the pop punk music that came afterward. My gut reaction is very much the same.

BUT The Ramones were a surprisingly complex band in terms of how much they successfully tackled.

Quote:

their sound was heavily influenced by early 60s pop such as The Beach Boys
That’s also a very important thing to understand about The Ramones.

Plus, the syrupy bubblegum of the early sixties.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MicShazam (Post 1950978)
If the Ramones aren't pop punk, then nothing is. They were no less smoothed out, happy clappy, mainstream friendly and neutered than Green Day, Blink and company were.

That’s profoundly incorrect.




There’s no shame in:

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Sane Psycho (Post 1950981)
Yes

It

Is

It's punk, right? It prominently features delicious pop hooks, right? Therefore, pop punk.

That’s true but The Ramones did it so much better than anyone. They were the greatest pop band ever AND the greatest punk band ever AND the greatest band ever period by any metric.

**** bro, enjoy whatever you enjoy, I just encourage you to feel the sacrosanct power of The Ramones that separates them from all others.

Oriphiel 05-15-2018 06:47 AM

Time to rewatch Rock 'n Roll High School.

OccultHawk 05-15-2018 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oriphiel (Post 1951038)
Time to rewatch Rock 'n Roll High School.

Church

Frownland 05-15-2018 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1950991)
you wouldn't call The Beatles "pop rock"

you would call them pop

or you would call them rock

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1950996)
lol

I can't

maybe some people do say this but it's ****ing stupid

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1951001)
if you google "pop rock" you will find a list of literally every rock band that has ever been popular

because it's a meaningless term

Why are you invoking meaningless terms to support your stance?

Janszoon 05-15-2018 07:48 AM

All I know is this conversation makes me want to listen to the Ramones.

OccultHawk 05-15-2018 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1951060)
proto-punk only makes sense out of the model that puts Ramones at ground zero punk

surf rock is in the DNA of classic punk

makes more sense to label them a major influence and stop there

I think you’re using different language to say the exact same thing.

Black Francis 05-15-2018 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 1951035)
I agree with elph in spirit, especially in the sense that it’s absolute blasphemy to associate The Ramones with the pop punk music that came afterward. My gut reaction is very much the same.

Same here, i get why elph wants to separate them from pop punk groups like Green day and Blink but Janz made a good point too cause i used to listen to Green Day and just thought they were punk. I can understand why some ppl would put them in that category but if were to tell somebody about The Ramones i would just say it's punk.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MicShazam (Post 1951012)
Genre terms aren't perfect. They're just supposed to help with categorization.

I agree with this too. I don't get too hung up on labelling bands, for exmpl like i said, I would call The Ramones punk but if someone wants to put them in the pop punk category at least make the distinction of what their place is in that category cause when you place them in the same genre as Blink 182 you absolutely have to make that distinction.

Black Francis 05-15-2018 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nathanblake719 (Post 1950959)
Hey The Sane Psycho, that's great that you love pop punk. I certainly don't. And it's good that you mentioned it because you brought up some more very overrated bands. The Ramones and Black Flag are two of the most overrated bands of all time. The Ramones are considered punk rock legends, their t-shirts are worn by people who aren't even punk rock fans. The band is featured in the soundtracks for both Pet Cemetery movies. Their most famous songs are the songs Blitzkreig Bop and Rock N Roll High School, songs which I don't think are anything special but think they must be very influential to be talked about as much as they are. Black Flag are considered underground punk rock legends. They are talked about allot by musicians even though they've never done one decent tune in their entire lives. Henry Rollins is not even a singer but for some reason decided to be the vocalist. Henry Rollins has gone on to be a music commentator and television personality as well as an Actor and motivational speaker. I think he's better at those things than at being a crappy singer.People talk about how good Black Flag are but can't even mention one song that's even worth listening to. They must enjoy the experience of the band rather than the actual musical compositions that the band creates which are pieces of crap. Henry Rollins makes up for his lack of musical talent by just behaving like an absolute hyperactive, antisocial nutcase and thinks that it makes him some sort of cool person.

Don't do that Nick. Don't oversimplify and define bands by their hits on pop culture. Im not an expert on either Black Flag or The Ramones but i don't pretend i am. What i do know is i heard enough good songs from them and know enough about the history of punk to understand why they earned the status they have. This stance you took that you got it all figured out by just scratching the surface is No Bueno.

And about Henry Rollins. Henry imo is a bit of a pretentious edge lord at times and a realist at other times so i can relate to some of his opinions but he's certainly not an all knowing punk sage whose words should be revered as gospel. His music is good tho, The Henry Rollins band got some good jams and as the frontman for Black Flag he was pretty badass.

Here's a Black Flag song worth listening to:



And here's some clips of Henry Rollins making sense:




grindy 05-15-2018 01:50 PM

I wouldn't have a problem with Nathan's opinions (although I do disagree with some), if he had any idea about music outside of boring, mainstream, basic bitch crap.
Seriously, instead of ranting, shut up, open your ears and follow the lead of some of the incredibly knowledgeable guys here on the forum.

OccultHawk 05-15-2018 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy (Post 1951118)
I wouldn't have a problem with Nathan's opinions (although I do disagree with some), if he had any idea about music outside of boring, mainstream, basic bitch crap.
Seriously, instead of ranting, shut up, open your ears and follow the lead of some of the incredibly knowledgeable guys here on the forum.

Yeah

I don’t like to engage people who aren’t ready to learn.

MicShazam 05-15-2018 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy (Post 1951118)
I wouldn't have a problem with Nathan's opinions (although I do disagree with some), if he had any idea about music outside of boring, mainstream, basic bitch crap.

Give the guy a chance and that might change. I didn't start really pulling my head out of my ass until about 10 years ago. Up until then, my musical world consisted of Metallica and other big metal acts, No Doubt, Kylie Minogue, Queen, Nirvana and the Offspring. Largely, anyway.

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy (Post 1951118)
Seriously, instead of ranting, shut up, open your ears and follow the lead of some of the incredibly knowledgeable guys here on the forum.

And my lead as well, maybe.

Blank. 05-15-2018 02:00 PM

Bjork. Seriously the definition of awful.

MicShazam 05-15-2018 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blank. (Post 1951123)
Bjork. Seriously the definition of awful.

It's Björk and I think she's got some pretty good songs. Plus some stuff I can't stand and a lot that I don't really care about.

Frownland 05-15-2018 02:03 PM

I don't like how she uses racial slurs.

MicShazam 05-15-2018 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1951126)
I don't like how she uses racial slurs.

Infrequently?

Frownland 05-15-2018 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MicShazam (Post 1951127)
Infrequently?

Frequently enough.

Cuthbert 05-15-2018 02:17 PM

When has Bjork used a racial slur?

Frownland 05-15-2018 02:18 PM

https://images.genius.com/6b2c08d903....800x800x1.jpg

Trollheart 05-15-2018 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blank. (Post 1951123)
Bjork. Seriously the definition of awful.

Isn't that some form of yogurt?

Blank. 05-15-2018 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MicShazam (Post 1951125)
It's Björk and I think she's got some pretty good songs. Plus some stuff I can't stand and a lot that I don't really care about.

I have never heard a single song by her that I can say I Legitimately enjoy. It's all crap.

Trollheart 05-15-2018 02:36 PM

The only Bjork song I know, but it's good

grindy 05-15-2018 02:38 PM

Björk is like Tool: "Experimental" music for basic bitches.

MicShazam 05-15-2018 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blank. (Post 1951135)
I have never heard a single song by her that I can say I Legitimately enjoy. It's all crap.

It's mostly just some songs from Homogenic and Post that I like.
Had a tough time appreciating the other one's I've heard. I guess Debut was also a decent album to me. I don't think her vocals are as annoying as many seem to think, but I think she got less interesting the more experimental she became (ironically).

Jenny Hval, Islaja and Olga Bell do Björk better than Björk.

Frownland 05-15-2018 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MicShazam (Post 1951141)
It's mostly just some songs from Homogenic and Post that I like.
Had a tough time appreciating the other one's I've heard. I guess Debut was also a decent album to me. I don't think her vocals are as annoying as many seem to think, but I think she got less interesting the more experimental she became (ironically).

Jenny Hval, Islaja and Olga Bell do Björk better than Björk.

Did you watch Dancer in the Dark yet?

MicShazam 05-15-2018 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1951143)
Did you watch Dancer in the Dark yet?

No, kinda forgot, actually. I might get around to it next month.

Janszoon 05-15-2018 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MicShazam (Post 1951145)
No, kinda forgot, actually. I might get around to it next month.

I personally don't like the movie, but the soundtrack album is amazing.

Janszoon 05-15-2018 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy (Post 1951140)
Björk is like Tool: "Experimental" music for basic bitches.

I would describe her more as musical theater music for people who like experimental music.

MicShazam 05-15-2018 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1951146)
I personally don't like the movie, but the soundtrack album is amazing.

I don't like any Von Trier movies, but people tell me his earliest movies are different, so I might give it the benefit of the doubt. If it at least has good music, that will help.

Janszoon 05-15-2018 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MicShazam (Post 1951148)
I don't like any Von Trier movies, but people tell me his earliest movies are different, so I might give it the benefit of the doubt. If it at least has good music, that will help.

It has good music but the music on the soundtrack is different, and better.

The Sane Psycho 05-15-2018 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1951126)
I don't like how she uses racial slurs.

Racial slurs are pretty cool tbh. Cracker.

OccultHawk 05-15-2018 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy (Post 1951140)
Björk is like Tool: "Experimental" music for basic bitches.

Church

grindy 05-15-2018 03:01 PM

This cracker gets it.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:56 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.