A_Perfect_Sonnet |
03-09-2006 10:38 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don
I couldn't help but be enraged by this. I cite a ****ing scholarly journal, and that means it was reviewed by numerous professionals in the ****ing field over a course of maybe a year. And then you come and say it's wrong just because you disagree with it. You can't disagree with fact for ****s sake.
|
If you want, I can dissect the article (which I did read), just to show you how pathetically inaccurate the grad student who wrote it was, but I'll just give you this:
"Emo, short for emotional music."
It was a brilliant deduction... too bad it isn't factual.
Therefore, I'm not disagreeing with fact, just some idiot's misled opinions. But I'm painfully aware of how no matter what, you're always right, so let's just say you win and you can cut out the bull shit. It's obvious you and urban have very little room in those inflated heads to learn about something for yourselves, which I guess is okay, since most of the mainstream is horribly uneducated about this anyway. You can just be another decimal on Victory and Vagrant records quarterly earnings report.
|