Quote:
Originally Posted by jgd85
No I am not. I am justifying that banning something because it only affects a small number of people is justified if it is unnecessary and preventable. He was comparing how we should ban trucks because they kill people. We NEED trucks to further advance the human race, and the truck has nothing to do with killing the children... the driver does. Pit Bulls serve no real purpose other than companionship or protection, and that could be replaced by another dog.
|
Another dog that fills the same role would be violent. Dogs that protect don't do it by blowing a panic whistle at the intruder.
Threaded Mode