It is an answer. Read it again.

Yes he does.

You can't say that.

You can't say that either, and even if you could, not planning on it does not make him a 'pussy'.

[Ben Stein voice]Wow, that was an incredible burn.

Come on, you can't back your **** up any better than that? Alright, I can match that...
It's a dodgy answer, and reading it again won't change my mind.
No he doesn't.
I just did.
I just did.

:laughing:

After reading that, i can safely say the interviewer is an absolute, bonified cunt. To publicly ridicule a man for the simple reason of lending a song for an advertisement campaign is ridiculous. he did it for no other reason but to promote his magazine and in the process negatively and i believe falsely presented Sully as a militant. and even if he is a pro-war, what right does he have to rip into him? he has no respect for freedom of speech, no respect for personal opinion and no understanding of free-will. you call it balls? i call it arrogance. the amount of times he twisted the guys words is pathetic. no wonder he only writes for a shitty magazine like that. i would of hit him.

I'm sure Sully would've too, had they met in person.

i would of made the effort to track him down and post dog shit through his letter box

so they're not really war mongerers, they're just money grabbing whores with no principles....much better....http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/2755/zacepi8dv.gif
apart from patheticly trying to insult me, the purpose of this was what? why don't you try to elaborate and explain to me how the war in Iraq is justified instead of splurting out some random slurs aye?
no, like you. i'm sure you'll notice that i've kept my cool in this thread.

oh, one more thing, i may be a fag ( i'm assuming that was the censored insult ), but i'm far from dumb...do try a bit harder to insult me next time ....http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/6/raspa3bb.gif

You tell him adidasss. Oh hey mate, beaten my Tetris score yet?

I'm starting to get bored, what's taking so long.

I wasn't trying to 'burn' you.

I could have, but I didn't feel the need to spell everything out for you. Apparently, now I have to.

How often do we see an interview in which the interviewer actually argues with the band member? Very, very rarely.

Yes, but your statement was erroneous. Who are you to say what someone else would or wouldn't have done?

Again, your statement was erroneous. You have no prerogative to say whether or not the interviewer planned the arguement or not.

dude, i told you i'd do it tommorow, i did some travelling today...

He's from Boston, every other guy on the street here is called Sully. If you walk into a bar in Boston, anyone, and yell "hey Sully" at least three guys will turn around.

How you get that title is your last name is Sullivan, and since we're the Irish-American capitol of the country, there you have it. I personally don't know how he got it, but its common where I hail from.

Also that interviewer was a complete spineless prick. This wasn't a band who had an opinion on the war, this was a band who didn't restrict the militery from using it in a commercial.

If we'll notice, he didn't drag some band who supported the war on because he would have probably got owned. He choose an easy target, a band who never said they supported the war, and a guy with an aganda who prepared. I hope that guy gets hit with a ****ing bus. He's a discredit to journalism and should be identified as someone who took an easy and cheap shot at a guy who was nice enough to help his ****bag magazine out.

Balls? How about we call him an oppertunist at best.

Oh okay, yeah cause you know, I think I bet your high score. I dunno, you might wanna double check, but I'm pretty sure it's my name at the top of the charts:D

/\ Can't you do that in another thread?

Yes.
Sully needs an education, or otherwise find something no-one else knows anything about and write about that. So no-one can easily prove him an idiot.

Care to explain how he doesn't have an education? Do you know him?

No I don't, and yes I do. Now what?

I didn't mean in his entirety that he has no education at all. Everyone has some form of education, advanced or not. I was meaning he needs a better understanding of the things the band is covering or getting into. If he had a concept of what the music was getting at he could have fully explained, and therefore defended Godsmack's position on such things. And if Jay continued with such prick-tainted questions, Sully would then be in a strong position to launch into such a half-arsed reporter.

But since he seemed to have no real clue, he came off looking like the dumbass.

Once again, you listen to green day.

I seem to be the only one who finds the Iraqis killing Americans funny.

Yeah.....

I sincerely hope that you are the only one that finds it funny, I don't find it funny at all

I don't find it funny as such, I guess that was the wrong choice of word. More that atleast they don't have to suffer and get tortured and humiliated like many innocent Iraqis were at the hands of American soldiers.

Maybe you don't watch the news but the same thing is happening to Americans by Iraqis, beheadings on Al-Jazeera anyone??

I am the last person to call anyone on bad taste on this forum, but that comment really made my stomach turn

How did Bush get France to take part in the Iraq war?

He told them Sadam was a member of Greenpeace.

lolol.

Your general comment was not directed at Bush, but the US soldiers. These people are merely doing their job, there is nothing funny about anyone getting killed doing their job

It would be funny if a moderator got RSI from banning too many users. Of course he wouldn't die but it would be funny.

Read the interview and you can tell exactly what he was trying to do. The interview had NOTHING to do with music and everything to do with his political beliefs (which he clearly wasn't comfortable talking about). And guess what, political believes happen to be personal, making it PRIVATE life.

Well, that one was weak as the first.
You have no idea what you're talking about, just shut your f*ckin' c*cksucker.
If your military offered you the plus side of ten grand to play your song in their commercial to support the troops that fight to the death for what you and millions of others believe in, are you gonna say no? If you would
I never said the Iraqi war was justified, but that doesn't mean Imma bash on the soldiers doing their jobs (not just the ones fighting the Officers, and Warrant Officers giving them orders) and if I wanted to insult you I'd do it without the humor.
Yeah, in this thread. So yeah, I guess then that I'm stupid for supporting my brothers in arms, standing up for the values and morals I believe in and subsequently burning down a mutual enemy of my countrymen and yours? Damn, you sure you're not French?

I don't see a cogent counter-arguement coming from you, o' charlatanic subjugator.

this statement isn't even worth responding to.

what i understood from the interview was that their music is used in a commercial for the army, if their music is being used to boost moral of american soldiers in Iraq, then i have no problems with it. lord knows those people are going through some fucked up shit.

and no, saddam husein is not an enemy of Croatia, he was the enemy of the iraqui people...and perhapse Izrael....i don't see how he was the enemy of the united states...

Why respond then.

What do Miss Muffet and Saddam Hussein have in common?

They both have Kurds in their Whey.

Saddam is no different than Osama or Hitler. These men (while I must credit their skill) are disgusting, shameless, and all together f*cked up beings. They would enslave their own in nightmarish conditions to see a corrupt dream to fruition. These kind of peole are everyone's enemy.

As for the commercials, they were actually Navy and Marine commercials...and I think the Air Force may have done it too.

I throw back what is thrown at me.

Apparently not.

What do you expect? A f*ckin' essay to comeback on a few lines, I don't think so. I'm American, we's lazy.

Perhaps a few lines to comeback on a few lines. http://www.invisionplus.net/forums/h...ons/mellow.gif

You're all welcome to ignore hiu and Stone magnet who are just a giant waste of time.

he says what i'm thinking...

beacuse we are ass buddies with isreal. and we were one of the sole factors for the creation of isreal, and are strong allies with it.

to whoever said Hitler was a skilled man. It has been scientifically proven through psychological research that Germans are freakishly obediant - alot more obediant than the majority of other Europeans. Check out findings from Milgram for proof. So it cannot be that hard brainwashing a nation of hugely obediant citizens with a skilled backroom to aid him.
And i hardly think Osama Bin Ladens an intelligent man either.

*by the way, hiu, explain to me your reasons behind saying what you've said prior to this post, because i dont understand your logic.

no, great brittain was a much biger factor in the creation of Israel. the reason why you're ass buddies with Israel is because of the Jewish lobby that essentially runs america.
oh here we go, the old "america is just trying to rid the world of evil" excuse....don't forget to invade North Korea will you? and about 50 other countries run by dictators...